Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:21:39 -0500
with message-id <2663863.FPfkurQo3f@localhost>
and subject line Re: RM: sra-sdk [i386 x32] -- ANAIS; requires a 64-bit address
space
has caused the Debian Bug report #1029474,
regarding RM: sra-sdk [i386 x32] -- ANAIS; requires a 64-bit address space
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1029474: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029474
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:sra-sdk
Fully building sra-sdk requires a 64-bit address space these days.
It might be possible to contrive to build some of its binary packages
on architectures with 32-bit address spaces, or even on architectures
ncbi-vdb doesn't support, but I'm not convinced it's worth the
effort. As such, could you please remove sra-toolkit (and
sra-toolkit-dbg) on i386 and x32? (I mentioned plural packages above,
but that's only the case for 3.x, which had this requirement all along.)
Thanks!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 20:06:10 -0500 "Aaron M. Ucko" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: remove
> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
> Control: affects -1 + src:sra-sdk
>
> Fully building sra-sdk requires a 64-bit address space these days.
> It might be possible to contrive to build some of its binary packages
> on architectures with 32-bit address spaces, or even on architectures
> ncbi-vdb doesn't support, but I'm not convinced it's worth the
> effort. As such, could you please remove sra-toolkit (and
> sra-toolkit-dbg) on i386 and x32? (I mentioned plural packages above,
> but that's only the case for 3.x, which had this requirement all along.)
It doesn't exist on i386 in instable, so nothing to do here. BTW, x32 is a
ports architecture that is not managed by the FTP Team.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
