Your message dated Mon, 06 Mar 2023 15:51:39 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line retracted by OP
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026226,
regarding emacs: Emacs ignores extended file attributes (xattr)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1026226: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026226
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: emacs
Version: 1:28.2+1-8
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
If a file has extended attributes and is edited with Emacs, the extended
attributes are lost.
The easiest and most common way to do this is to assign keywords, comments or
ratings to a file with the file manager Dolphin* and then open this file with
Emacs and change it so that it can be "written" under the same name.
(* Or alternatively: setfattr -n user.xdg.tags -v "keyword")
On the homepage of Emacs I think I read that Emacs can handle extended
attributes. This is obviously still not the case here. However, should this
behavior be desired in the form, consider this letter as irrelevant.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.0.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=de:en_GB:en_US
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages emacs depends on:
ii emacs-gtk 1:28.2+1-8
emacs recommends no packages.
emacs suggests no packages.
-- debconf-show failed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
See followup by reporter
--
If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not.
--- End Message ---
