Your message dated Wed, 8 Mar 2023 18:49:12 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#1032316: llvm-toolchain-15: is this version intended for Debian 12 'bookworm'? has caused the Debian Bug report #1032316, regarding llvm-toolchain-15: is this version intended for Debian 12 'bookworm'? to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 1032316: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032316 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: llvm-toolchain-15 Version: 1:15.0.7-1 Severity: serious Justification: blocking RC bug fixes in Mesa from migrating X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] llvm-toolchain-15/1:15.0.7-1 was uploaded several weeks ago, shortly after the transition freeze, but has not migrated to testing due to an autopkgtest regression (#1029010). Mesa uses LLVM 15, so the new upstream release is preventing Mesa bug fixes from migrating, some of them important or even release-critical. Is this version intended to enter testing in time for Debian 12 'bookworm'? It seems quite late in the release process for the restructuring that happened in 1:15.0.6-5~exp1 to be uploaded to unstable, for example. If this version is meant to enter testing, then please fix the autopkgtest (I'll follow up to #1029010 with more about that) and coordinate with the release team to get it into unstable. Or, if this version is not meant to enter testing, please upload a version to unstable that is intended for testing (which might involve reverting some of the changes and/or using a "+really" version), and then re-upload the newer version to experimental. For more details of the freeze timeline, please refer to <https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html>, <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/01/msg00004.html> and <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/02/msg00003.html>. Thanks, smcv
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Fri, 03 Mar 2023 at 16:31:09 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > Is this version intended to enter testing in time for Debian 12 'bookworm'? On Bug#1032317, Sylvestre Ledru writes: > yeah, it is intended for bookworm which is the answer I was looking for, so I'm closing this bug. After #1032317 is fixed (which I believe should also result in the autopkgtest regression #1029010 being fixed), please coordinate with the release team to get an unblock for the updated package so that mesa and rocm-hipamd can also migrate. Thanks, smcv
--- End Message ---
