Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:51:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line sylpheed, libetpan and gnutls
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: important
When clicking on an IMAPs folder, sylpheed-claws-gtk2 segfaults when it
tries to connect to the server.
Here is the gdb backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1082132832 (LWP 16796)]
0x00002aaaad4a6ed3 in _gnutls_selected_certs_set () from
/usr/lib/libgnutls.so.12
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00002aaaad4a6ed3 in _gnutls_selected_certs_set () from
/usr/lib/libgnutls.so.12
#1 0x00002aaaad4a7749 in _gnutls_proc_cert_cert_req () from
/usr/lib/libgnutls.so.12
#2 0x00002aaaad49ab24 in _gnutls_recv_server_certificate_request () from
/usr/lib/libgnutls.so.12
#3 0x00002aaaad497afa in _gnutls_handshake_client () from
/usr/lib/libgnutls.so.12
#4 0x00002aaaad4983af in gnutls_handshake () from /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.12
#5 0x00002aaaac8fb391 in mailstream_ssl_init_not_required () from
/usr/lib/libetpan.so.6
#6 0x00002aaaac8fb453 in mailstream_low_ssl_open_full () from
/usr/lib/libetpan.so.6
#7 0x00002aaaac8fb773 in mailstream_ssl_open () from /usr/lib/libetpan.so.6
#8 0x00002aaaac90bdca in mailimap_ssl_connect () from /usr/lib/libetpan.so.6
#9 0x0000000000525a79 in connect_ssl_run (op=<value optimized out>) at
imap-thread.c:297
#10 0x000000000053db92 in thread_run (data=<value optimized out>) at
etpan-thread-manager.c:297
#11 0x00002aaaab815b1c in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#12 0x00002aaaacb3e962 in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
#13 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
Please reassign bug to libetpan or gnutls if necessary.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-generic
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Versions of packages sylpheed-claws-gtk2 depends on:
ii libaspell15 0.60.4-3 GNU Aspell spell-checker runtime l
ii libc6 2.3.6-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcompfaceg1 1:1.5.2-3 Compress/decompress images for mai
ii libetpan6 0.45-1 mail handling library
ii libglib2.0-0 2.10.1-2 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.12.1-3 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture -
ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.12.1-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libldap2 2.1.30-13 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libpango1.0-0 1.12.0-2 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libpisock8 0.11.8-21 Library for communicating with a P
ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-8 SSL shared libraries
Versions of packages sylpheed-claws-gtk2 recommends:
ii aspell-en [aspell-diction 6.0-0-5 English dictionary for GNU Aspell
ii metamail 2.7-51 implementation of MIME
pn sylpheed-claws-gtk2-i18n <none> (no description available)
pn sylpheed-claws-scripts <none> (no description available)
ii xfonts-100dpi 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5 100 dpi fonts for X
ii xfonts-75dpi 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5 75 dpi fonts for X
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi James,
Sorry for the late reply, but I didn't receive the mail, just saw it in
the BTS. Next times better mail to the bug submitter with Cc to the bug.
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 11:18:10 +0100
James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have just taken over maintainence of gnutls, and are trying to deal
> with the bugs. You filed bug #360887. It seems like sylpheed, libetpan
> and gnutls have all progressed quite far from when this bug was filed.
>
> I am unable to reproduce this bug at the moment, though I never tried
> when it was filed. Have you had any more reports that might suggest this
> bug still exists?
Yep, I think it has been fixed by newer versions, so lets close it for now.
Happy take over ;-)
--
Ricardo Mones
~
You have the capacity to learn from mistakes. You'll learn a lot
today. /usr/games/fortune
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
