Your message dated Tue, 1 Aug 2023 16:53:59 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1042831: gmt-gshhg-data Recommends files aready
included by the Depends
has caused the Debian Bug report #1042831,
regarding gmt-gshhg-data Recommends files aready included by the Depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1042831: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042831
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gmt
Version: 6.4.0+dfsg-2+b1
Severity: minor
We see:
Depends: gmt-common (= 6.4.0+dfsg-2), libc6 (>= 2.35), libgmt6 (>= 6.4.0),
libnetcdf19 (>= 3.6.1)
Recommends: gmt-gshhg-data | gmt-gshhg-low, gmt-dcw
But aren't all the gmt-gshhg-data Recommends files already included by the
Depends?
$ dlocate --filename-only /binned|xargs ls -og|rev|sort|rev
-rw-r--r-- 1 136598 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt-gshhg/binned_GSHHS_c.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 136598 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_GSHHS_c.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 60813 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt-gshhg/binned_border_c.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 60813 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_border_c.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 229095 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt-gshhg/binned_river_c.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 229095 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_river_c.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 31935651 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_GSHHS_f.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 2131261 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_border_f.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 7619434 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_river_f.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 8437674 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_GSHHS_h.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 509728 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_border_h.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 2266940 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_river_h.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 2206533 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt-gshhg/binned_GSHHS_i.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 2206533 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_GSHHS_i.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 217433 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt-gshhg/binned_border_i.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 217433 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_border_i.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 908481 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt-gshhg/binned_river_i.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 908481 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_river_i.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 550248 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt-gshhg/binned_GSHHS_l.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 550248 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_GSHHS_l.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 98738 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt-gshhg/binned_border_l.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 98738 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_border_l.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 364773 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt-gshhg/binned_river_l.nc
-rw-r--r-- 1 364773 2017-06-14 /usr/share/gmt/coast/binned_river_l.nc
And installing higher resolutions wouldn't make any point, as they are
already installed.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 8/1/23 16:33, Dan Jacobson wrote:
But aren't all the gmt-gshhg-data Recommends files already included by the
Depends?
They are not.
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
--- End Message ---
