Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2023 12:54:26 +0200
with message-id <ZOc24gZrGB04rrB6@per>
and subject line Re: retitle 1011259 to pdns expects 64-bit time_t
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023278,
regarding dnsdist expects 64-bit time_t
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1023278: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023278
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pdns
Version: 4.6.2-1
Severity: important
Hello,
I'm slowly working towards bringing OpenLDAP 2.6.x to Debian
experimental, and pdns is one of its reverse dependencies. In the
process of rebuilding it, I noticed that it FTBFS on armhf, armel, i386
and mipsel:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
checking size of time_t... 4
configure: error: size of time_t is 4, which is not large enough to fix the
y2k38 bug
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
This is done on purpose by upstream. I also noticed that Fedora
disables the build of pdns on i386 and armhf. I strongly believe we
should do the same in Debian. If you take a look at the current build
logs, you'll notice that the package is already FTBFSing on those
architectures.
Cheers,
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
https://sergiodj.net/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.7.3-2
dnsdist now B-D architecture-is-64-bit, so this problem is "hidden"
from 32bit archs.
Chris
--- End Message ---
