Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 23:30:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375282: libgsf-1.la missing from libgsf-1-dev_1.14.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgsf-1-dev
Version: 1.14.1-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
/usr/lib/libgsf-1.la seems to be missing from libgsf-1-dev_1.14.1-1_i386.deb
while it is present
in libgsf-1-dev_1.14.1-2_i386.deb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dpkg --contents libgsf-1-dev_1.14.1-1_i386.deb | grep
libgsf-1.la
-rw-r--r-- root/root 931 2006-05-08 23:26 ./usr/lib/libgsf-1.la
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dpkg --contents libgsf-1-dev_1.14.1-2_i386.deb | grep
libgsf-1.la
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
This for instance prevents building beagle (at least from source tarball 0.2.7).
Cheers,
Eric
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (103, 'testing'), (102, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages libgsf-1-dev depends on:
ii libbz2-dev 1.0.3-2 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii libglib2.0-dev 2.10.3-1 Development files for the GLib lib
ii libgsf-1-114 1.14.1-1 Structured File Library - runtime
ii libxml2-dev 2.6.26.dfsg-1 Development files for the GNOME XM
Versions of packages libgsf-1-dev recommends:
ii pkg-config 0.20-1 manage compile and link flags for
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 00:18:50 +0200, Eric Mountain wrote:
> /usr/lib/libgsf-1.la seems to be missing from
> libgsf-1-dev_1.14.1-1_i386.deb while it is present in
> libgsf-1-dev_1.14.1-2_i386.deb:
It's the other way around and it's not missing. It was removed on purpose as
documented in the package's changelog.
> This for instance prevents building beagle (at least from source tarball
> 0.2.7).
Only if the librsvg2-dev package in the build environment is out of date.
librsvg2-dev_2.14.4-2 no longer contains /usr/lib/librsvg-2.la and sid's
beagle package builds fine with it.
I'm closing this report.
Ray
--
"a infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good
program"
.../linux/Documentation/CodingStyle
--- End Message ---
