Your message dated Sat, 9 Dec 2023 10:23:36 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: patsy and pandas 2.x
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053948,
regarding patsy: FTBFS with pandas 2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1053948: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053948
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:patsy
Version: 0.5.3-1
Control: block 1043240 by -1
patsy fails to build with pandas 2.1, currently in experimental.
Log:
https://launchpad.net/~rebecca-palmer/+archive/ubuntu/pandas2p1/+build/26770725/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-mantic-amd64.patsy_0.5.3-1_BUILDING.txt.gz
A common source of failures is new pandas FutureWarnings in tests that
are set to fail on unexpected warnings.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This appears to have been a non-patsy bug, as it has now gone away
without the version of patsy changing.
(patsy does currently appear to be broken by python 3.12, but that's a
separate issue.)
--- End Message ---
