Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:11:12 +0100
with message-id 
<cadstwjjtunpmy9xm1h-9vxp2ujgdwpuwjq5iyuthy0_m_gb...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Uses more than double amount of memory on 64bit
has caused the Debian Bug report #432265,
regarding Uses more than double amount of memory on 64bit
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
432265: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432265
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: amavisd-new
Version: 1:2.4.2-6.1
Severity: normal

Hi,

I just noticed that two almost identical amavisd-new installations had
wildly different memory usages.

The only difference is that one system is i386, whereas the other amd64.

On i386, top reports:

 VIRT  RES  SHR CODE DATA SWAP nFLT %MEM   TIME+  COMMAND
58660  52m 5176 1024  46m 4700    9  5.3  0:01.94 amavisd (master)
59428  49m 1468 1024  46m 9176    0  4.9  0:00.00 amavisd (virgin child)
59428  49m 1440 1024  46m 9204    0  4.9  0:00.01 amavisd (virgin child)
59428  49m 1464 1024  46m 9180    0  4.9  0:00.01 amavisd (virgin child)

Whereas on amd64:

 VIRT  RES  SHR CODE DATA SWAP nFLT %MEM   TIME+  COMMAND
 164m  95m 9016   12  83m  68m   12  9.5  0:02.93 amavisd (master)
 165m  88m 1408   12  83m  77m    0  8.8  0:00.01 amavisd (virgin child)
 165m  88m 1400   12  83m  77m    0  8.8  0:00.01 amavisd (virgin child)
 165m  88m 1372   12  83m  77m    0  8.8  0:00.01 amavisd (virgin child)

Both were started a few minutes ago, so the difference isn't caused by the
64bit version having been running for a long time.

I'm having a hard time accepting this difference as normal.

Maybe this is a bug in perl?

i386:  This is perl, v5.8.8 built for i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi
amd64: This is perl, v5.8.8 built for x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi

Andras

-- 
                 Andras Korn <korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu>
                 <http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/> QOTD:
           The future has been cancelled owing to lack of interest.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
>I don't know if

there is anything we can do about it.

Hi,

The generic solution for this problem is using the x32 architecture
that uses 32bit pointers on 64bit cpu.

This cannot be solved in this one package, thus closing.

Greetings

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to