Your message dated Wed, 27 Mar 2024 10:16:53 +0100
with message-id <zgpkby9lvlgdk...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1067769: nmu: libjcat_0.2.0-2+b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067769,
regarding nmu: libjcat_0.2.0-2+b1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1067769: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067769
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: libj...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libjcat
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu libjcat_0.2.0-2 . armel armhf . unstable . -m "rebuild against 
libgpgme11t64"

Possibly not very high impact, but I think this would unblock fwupd.

    smcv

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-03-26 14:11:02 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: libj...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:libjcat
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu libjcat_0.2.0-2 . armel armhf . unstable . -m "rebuild against 
> libgpgme11t64"

Scheduled

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to