Bug#1065470: marked as done (RM: ceph [armel armhf i386] -- ROM; 32 bits not supported upstream, too hard to maintain)

Debian Bug Tracking System Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:36:14 -0700

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:32:44 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1065470: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065470,
regarding RM: ceph [armel armhf i386] -- ROM; 32 bits not supported upstream, 
too hard to maintain
to be marked as done.


This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1065470: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065470
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

--- Begin Message ---

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:ceph


Hi there!

We tried to retain 32 bits support for as long as it was possible in this
package, but at this point, we (ie: myself and bzed) believe it's not
reasonable to continue with it. There's no CI upstream supporting it, and
it becomes increasingly difficult to support these small platforms that
don't have enough address space to compile without many tricks.

I already filled bugs against reverse dependencies, that were linked against
librados-dev or librbd-dev, and at this point, it should be all fixed
already. If not, bugs can be raised to serious.

Note that Ceph 18.2.x still doesn't build against mips64el, and at this
point, I'm not sure we will continue to support it, as I don't have the
skills, upstream doesn't support it, and nobody is volunteering for help.
I'm not sure how to reach porters for help btw.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

      ceph | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
 ceph-base | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
ceph-base-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
ceph-common | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
ceph-common-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
ceph-immutable-object-cache | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
ceph-immutable-object-cache-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
  ceph-mds | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
ceph-mds-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
  ceph-mgr | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
ceph-mgr-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
  ceph-mon | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
ceph-mon-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
  ceph-osd | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
ceph-osd-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
 ceph-test | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
   cephadm | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
cephfs-mirror | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
cephfs-mirror-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
libcephfs-dev | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
libcephfs-jni | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
libcephfs2 | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
libcephfs2-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
librados-dev | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
 librados2 | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
librados2-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
libradospp-dev | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
libradosstriper-dev | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
libradosstriper1 | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
libradosstriper1-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
librbd-dev | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
   librbd1 | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
librbd1-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
librgw-dev | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
   librgw2 | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
librgw2-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
libsqlite3-mod-ceph | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
libsqlite3-mod-ceph-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
libsqlite3-mod-ceph-dev | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
python3-ceph-argparse | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
python3-cephfs | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
python3-rados | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
python3-rbd | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
python3-rgw | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
rados-objclass-dev | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
   radosgw | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
radosgw-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
  rbd-fuse | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
rbd-fuse-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
rbd-mirror | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
rbd-mirror-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
   rbd-nbd | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386
rbd-nbd-dbg | 16.2.11+ds-5 | armel, armhf, i386

------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; 32 bits not supported upstream, too hard to maintain
----------------------------------------------

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1065470

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Bug#1065470: marked as done (RM: ceph [armel armhf i386] -- ROM; 32 bits not supported upstream, too hard to maintain)

Reply via email to