Your message dated Thu, 23 May 2024 23:21:38 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1071676: Packages-arch-specific: Remove ethtool?
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071676,
regarding Packages-arch-specific: Remove ethtool?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1071676: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071676
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
ethtool has been declared as "Architecture: linux-any" since 1:5.8-1
(see https://bugs.debian.org/961965), which predates oldstable. It's
still a problem in oldoldstable, but I'm not sure Packages-arch-specific
systematically cares about that. Can we just remove it?
diff --git a/Packages-arch-specific b/Packages-arch-specific
index aa69ebe..d15ba5f 100644
--- a/Packages-arch-specific
+++ b/Packages-arch-specific
@@ -56,6 +56,5 @@ fdflush: alpha amd64 i386
# amd64/i3
# linux specific
%bidentd: !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386
-%ethtool: !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386
%linuxtv-dvb-apps: !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386
%vmpk: !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386 # needs
RtMidi/real ALSA, see #557899
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [[email protected]]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-05-23 17:25, Colin Watson wrote:
> Package: buildd.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> ethtool has been declared as "Architecture: linux-any" since 1:5.8-1
> (see https://bugs.debian.org/961965), which predates oldstable. It's
> still a problem in oldoldstable, but I'm not sure Packages-arch-specific
> systematically cares about that. Can we just remove it?
This is not an issue as we do not have non-linux architectures in
(old)(old)stable branches.
> diff --git a/Packages-arch-specific b/Packages-arch-specific
> index aa69ebe..d15ba5f 100644
> --- a/Packages-arch-specific
> +++ b/Packages-arch-specific
> @@ -56,6 +56,5 @@ fdflush: alpha amd64 i386
> # amd64/i3
>
> # linux specific
> %bidentd: !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386
> -%ethtool: !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386
> %linuxtv-dvb-apps: !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386
> %vmpk: !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386 # needs
> RtMidi/real ALSA, see #557899
Thanks, applied.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
[email protected] http://aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
