Your message dated Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:13:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nologin will stay in /usr/sbin
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: login
Version: 1:4.0.16-2
Severity: normal
Make following move:
/usr/bin/nologin /bin/nologin
The /usr is a problem for systems that may not be able to mount the
/usr file system.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
Versions of packages login depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libpam-modules 0.79-3.1 Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii libpam-runtime 0.79-3.1 Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii libpam0g 0.79-3.1 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
login recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.0.16-2
The discussion in that bug report concluded that /usr/sbin is the
right place for nologin, at least according to the Debian way to see
these things (which is actually shared with the FreeBSD people).
The fact that RH/FC or OpenBSD put it in /sbin does not make it any
more correct. I'd like to hear abou ttheir reasons to believe that
nologin is needed in single user mode which is usually the only
situation where /usr is not mounted.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
