Your message dated Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:17:20 +0200
with message-id 
<CAHt6kzH=rg4x7qzwzct9+7hd5r+qyruhnhfjsyr8l96zdmn...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1071977: tmux: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6: 
version `NCURSES6_TINFO_6.4.current' 404
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071977,
regarding tmux: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6: version 
`NCURSES6_TINFO_6.4.current' 404
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1071977: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071977
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tmux
Version: 3.4-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]

I'm not sure whether this is a purely local issue but it's

tmux: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6: version `NCURSES6_TINFO_6.4.current'
not found (required by tmux)

tmux:
  Installed: 3.4-5
  Candidate: 3.4-5
  Version table:
 *** 3.4-5 510
        500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
        510 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     3.4-5~bpo12+1 100
        100 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports/main amd64
Packages
     3.3a-3 500
        500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian stable/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian bookworm/main amd64 Packages
     3.3a-3~bpo11+1 100
        100 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports/main amd64
Packages
     3.1c-1+deb11u1 500
        500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian bullseye/main amd64 Packages

libtinfo6:
  Installed: 6.5-2
  Candidate: 6.5-2
  Version table:
 *** 6.5-2 510
        500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
        510 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     6.4-4 500
        500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian stable/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian bookworm/main amd64 Packages
     6.2+20201114-2+deb11u2 500
        500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian bullseye/main amd64 Packages


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (510, 'unstable'), (509, 'experimental'), (500, 
'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 
'oldstable-security'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.8.9-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_WARN, 
TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages tmux depends on:
ii  libc6                   2.38-11
ii  libevent-core-2.1-7t64  2.1.12-stable-8.1+b1
ii  libsystemd0             255.4-1+b1
ii  libtinfo6               6.5-2
ii  libutempter0            1.2.1-3

tmux recommends no packages.

tmux suggests no packages.

-- debconf-show failed

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 4:57 PM Bernhard Übelacker
<[email protected]> wrote:
> is this probably caused by having e.g. tmux from a Debian repository,
> and libtinfo from a Kali repository.
>
> I guess this could qualify this installation as "FrankenDebian" [1].

This is probably what happened here, indeed. Thanks for the follow up.

Closing this bug for now, if there is indeed a bug in a pure Debian
install, please reopen.

-- 
Romain Francoise <[email protected]>
https://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to