Your message dated Mon, 16 Sep 2024 13:05:16 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1081179: fixed in gtk+3.0 3.24.43-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081179,
regarding Example patch hunk from a commit message applied to package source
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1081179: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081179
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gtk+3.0
Version: 3.24.43-3
When I download the gtk+3.0 source package via 'apt source' on Debian
sid, I find that the source file demos/gtk-demo/dialog.c contains this
statement in message_dialog_clicked():
gtk_window_set_title (GTK_WINDOW (dialog), "Some informative title");
This statement isn't in the upstream package. It has appeared in the
Debian source as a result of applying the patch in
debian/patches/a11y-Use-non-empty-message-dialog-title-as-a11y-name.patch
But if you look at that patch, it's in 'git format-patch' format,
containing a few headers, a commit message, and then the actual patch.
And the patch hunk that introduced "Some informative title" is part of
the _commit message_: it's clear from the surrounding text that the
commit message author intended it as an example of the kind of change
you _could_ apply if you wanted to test the behaviour modified by the
patch. The author even indented the entire patch hunk by 4 spaces to
indicate extra clearly that it wasn't intended to be applied.
So it surely should _not_ have been applied to the Debian source!
(I suppose this could very well be viewed as a bug in whatever thing
underlying 'apt source' is applying the patches, but I don't know enough
about that part of Debian to be reliably able to report the bug in the
right place.)
Cheers,
Simon
--
for k in [pow(x,37,0x1a1298d262b49c895d47f) for x in [0x50deb914257022de7fff,
0x213558f2215127d5a2d1, 0x90c99e86d08b91218630, 0x109f3d0cfbf640c0beee7,
0xc83e01379a5fbec5fdd1, 0x19d3d70a8d567e388600e, 0x534e2f6e8a4a33155123]]:
print("".join([chr(32+3*((k>>x)&1))for x in range(79)])) # <[email protected]>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gtk+3.0
Source-Version: 3.24.43-4
Done: Simon McVittie <[email protected]>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gtk+3.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> (supplier of updated gtk+3.0 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:11:27 +0100
Source: gtk+3.0
Architecture: source
Version: 3.24.43-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Simon McVittie <[email protected]>
Closes: 1081179
Changes:
gtk+3.0 (3.24.43-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* d/p/a11y-Use-non-empty-message-dialog-title-as-a11y-name.patch:
Edit patch so the long description is not used as part of the diff
(Closes: #1081179)
* d/rules: Don't build gtk-update-icon-cache on release architectures.
Ideally src:gtk4 would take over gtk-update-icon-cache on all
architectures, but it isn't buildable on all -ports architectures
yet, and the -ports architectures are more susceptible to packages
temporarily disappearing.
Checksums-Sha1:
5e73804c373cc78c5f57cc2d813b131bda822d4a 4945 gtk+3.0_3.24.43-4.dsc
86826debdd2998338bca1935507a7af159b2b5b2 3464144
gtk+3.0_3.24.43-4.debian.tar.xz
60e5d78c6138c492c07d8d58a5b95d9e01d7efa9 15547
gtk+3.0_3.24.43-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
b05f287e3d38ed791864d6e1b831b35766ca527b1a4f9c45a77907ee483c415c 4945
gtk+3.0_3.24.43-4.dsc
655fbaca5622882f9d7f124ed8899460bc22c7179a5e7e38e9cacb64adfede95 3464144
gtk+3.0_3.24.43-4.debian.tar.xz
ddb78683633b4638f5bec4c5d82fb5d30997ed2c9966a603ec365aac33ff3d0f 15547
gtk+3.0_3.24.43-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
2f6b4f6ba64fd5b1c5c26239f6750e01 4945 libs optional gtk+3.0_3.24.43-4.dsc
8eacd8b02632684179ccde706bda29c3 3464144 libs optional
gtk+3.0_3.24.43-4.debian.tar.xz
8c9efd42d1f8a85ebc4d4092ddd6838d 15547 libs optional
gtk+3.0_3.24.43-4_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=/G8w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpThzYTzwImG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
