Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2024 02:26:21 +0200
with message-id
<CAErCQkgq31=DZ=vgure0dzpv6oeqdpekpzrc5zxhhrqk6cv...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Resolved in debian-faq 11.0.
has caused the Debian Bug report #995435,
regarding debian-faq: remove links to obsolete user help forums (was: Re: Is
debianHELP correct ?)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
995435: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995435
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-faq
Severity: normal
Tags: +patch
Reporting this as a bug so it won't get lost. Sebul and Justin B Rye: thanks a
lot!
Bye,
Joost
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 09:38:41AM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Sebul wrote:
> > Please see
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/support.en.html#s12.2.2
> > At 12.2.2. Webforms
> > link to debianHELP is strange.
>
> Apparently its decay has reached the stage of expired SSL
> certificates, so it's about time debian-faq/support.dbk was trimmed
> back to only point at forums.debian.net.
>
> <section id="s12.2.2"><title>Web forum</title>
> <para>
> <ulink url="http://forums.debian.net/";>Debian User Forums</ulink>
> provides web forums on which you can submit questions about Debian
> and have them answered by other users. (It is not officially part
> of the Debian project.)
> </para>
> </section>
>
> That would be a minimal fix, but I'd also want to reorganise it now.
> DebianHELP was entirely "third-party", but forums.debian.net is not
> ("https://bits.debian.org/2021/08/debianuserforums.html";) - the
> debian-user mailinglist isn't "official" in that it guarantees an
> authoritative answer from the DPL, or supersedes the NO WARRANTY
> warnings, it's just that it's the "preferred" support channel.
> Perhaps it needs to say something like:
>
> <section id="s12.2.2"><title>Web forum</title>
> <para>
> Besides the official mailing lists, there are also web forums at
> <ulink url="http://forums.debian.net/";>Debian User Forums</ulink>
> on which you can submit questions about Debian and have them
> answered by other users.
> </para>
> </section>
> --
> JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
> sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-faq
Version: 11.0
These fixes were applied and released with debian-faq 11.0, two years
ago. Thanks for your contribution!
Ender.
--
Consultor de seguridad - Security consultant
Desarrollador de Debian - Debian developer
--- End Message ---
