Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:20:35 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1084992: ITS: mpm-itk
has caused the Debian Bug report #1084992,
regarding ITS: mpm-itk
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1084992: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1084992
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: mpm-itk
Version: 2.4.7-04-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], Steinar H. Gunderson <[email protected]>,
Package Salvaging Team <[email protected]>
Hi
I'm interested in salvaging your package mpm-itk, in accordance with the
Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1].
Your package meets the criteria for this process, and I would love to
assist in preserving and maintaining it. As the Salvage process
suggests, here is a list of the criteria that apply, in my opinion:
- Bugs filed against the package do not have answers from the
maintainer.
- There are QA issues with the package.
I've set up a repository within the salvage-team space[2] to assist you
with this initial setup. If you decide not to accept the ITS, this
repository can easily be moved to another location, such as debian/, or
any place of your choosing. I hope this service helps make the
transition to using a Git repository on Salsa smoother and more
convenient for you.
Your package was highlighted in the Bug of the Day[3] initiative, which
aims to introduce newcomers to manageable tasks and guide them through
the workflow to solve them. The focus of this initiative is on migrating
packages to Salsa, as it's a great way to familiarize newcomers with a
consistent Git-based workflow.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1]
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#package-salvaging
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/salvage-team/mpm-itk
[3] https://salsa.debian.org/tille/tiny_qa_tools/-/wikis/Tiny-QA-tasks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.3.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Steinar,
Am Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 12:20:53PM +0200 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 12:16:01PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Well, the package simply was showing up in the query for the bug of the day
> > fulfilling the criteria
> >
> > - No VCS or obviously outdated VCS (alioth, svn, cvs)
>
> Yes, I've never really used those; especially for small packages with a
> single maintainer, I don't feel they buy me anything.
I guess its a waste of time to explain the advantages of a Vcs like Git
to you so I do not try. Having Salsa CI is I nice thing to have on top.
I do not see any reason to avoid this.
> > - Standards-Version < 4
> > - not uploaded last 5 years
>
> Yes, there's been no upload because there's no new upstream version,
> and no obvious issues. :-) I could do a Standards-Version bump just to get a
> rebuild, but it also feels like doing an upload just for the sake of it.
Lintian issues of the current packages are:
E: libapache2-mpm-itk: apache2-module-does-not-ship-load-file mpm_itk
[usr/lib/apache2/modules/mpm_itk.so]
E: libapache2-mpm-itk: copyright-not-using-common-license-for-apache2
W: mpm-itk source: package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version 9
I: mpm-itk source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
I: mpm-itk source: no-dh-sequencer [debian/rules]
I: mpm-itk source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.4 (released 2012-09-19)
(current is 4.7.0)
Lintian issues in https://salsa.debian.org/salvage-team/mpm-itk are:
E: libapache2-mpm-itk: apache2-module-does-not-ship-load-file mpm_itk
[usr/lib/apache2/modules/mpm_itk.so]
I: mpm-itk source: debian-watch-uses-insecure-uri
http://mpm-itk.sesse.net/mpm-itk-(\d[\d.-]+).tar.gz [debian/watch:3]
I guess the Error is a false positive.
I consider the latter a progress besides including the patch for
#833365.
Your choice - you are the maintainer which we happily verified now -
thus closing the ITS bug. Feel free to sign and upload or leave it as
is.
Thanks again for your quick response
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
--- End Message ---
