Your message dated Fri, 22 Nov 2024 02:33:55 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1082559: libimage-exiftool-perl: please update to
latest upstream version
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082559,
regarding libimage-exiftool-perl: please update to latest upstream version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1082559: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082559
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libimage-exiftool-perl
Version: 12.57+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Dear Maintainer,
I'd like to request a newer upstream version of libimage-exiftool-perl to be
packaged, e.g. 12.96 from Sept 1st
thank you,
Filippo
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.7
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 6.9.7+bpo-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages libimage-exiftool-perl depends on:
ii perl 5.36.0-7+deb12u1
Versions of packages libimage-exiftool-perl recommends:
ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.68-1
pn libunicode-linebreak-perl <none>
Versions of packages libimage-exiftool-perl suggests:
pn libposix-strptime-perl <none>
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 11:30:02 +0000, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> > In the end, we can't satisfy both expectations (or: we can't close
> > both #1041852 and #1082559, as they contradict each other).
> > Currently I think packaging (only) production releases is okay, as we
> > also do this for other distributions on the CPAN.
> Packaging the production release only makes sense to me.
Thanks for your followup!
I guess this means it's ok to close this bug.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
: :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
`. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
`-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
--- End Message ---
