Your message dated Fri, 27 Dec 2024 22:28:33 -0500
with message-id
<CAO6P2QS-6zefnCod6Sin0=_khsexdtyj6kqfuybmp_3yeib...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line RE: RM: rust-vm-memory, rust-vhost, rust-vhost-user-backend,
rust-virtio-queue [armel, armhf, i386] RoP RoM ANALIS
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090075,
regarding RM: rust-vm-memory, rust-vhost, rust-vhost-user-backend,
rust-virtio-queue [armel, armhf, i386] RoP RoM ANALIS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1090075: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1090075
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Please remove rust-vm-memory and it's reverse dependencies rust-vhost,
rust-vhost-user-backend
and rust-virtio-queue on 32-bit architectures. The new version of
rust-vm-memory has a
build-dependeny on "architecture-is-64-bit" and the other packages in the list
all
build-depend on packages provided by rust-vm-memory, so these shouldn't
inadvertantly
come back.
I had hoped that upstream would come around to supporting these packages on
32-bit
architectures but they have done the opposite and the only application that uses
these packages has never been built on 32-bit. So I now agree with mjt that
maintaining
these packages on 32-bit architectures is more of a burden than a value.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Heyya Peter,
There's a subtle syntax in the bug title; so I took the liberty of fixing
it by hand. I think the auto-decrufter already resolved this situation
after taking a look as to why I was getting a noop.
Can you confirm it's in good shape and as desired on 32 bit arches, and if
not reopen this bug?
Thanks very much!
paultag
--
:wq
--- End Message ---
