Bug#1091911: marked as done (hdf5 FTBFS on hppa)

Debian Bug Tracking System Sun, 05 Jan 2025 11:27:18 -0800

Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2025 19:24:53 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1091911: fixed in hdf5 1.14.5+repack-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091911,
regarding hdf5 FTBFS on hppa
to be marked as done.


This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1091911: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems

--- Begin Message ---

Package: hdf5
Version: 1.14.5+repack-2
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: hppa

The fortran test is the only one which fails on hppa:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hdf5&arch=hppa&ver=1.14.5%2Brepack-2&stamp=1735623616&raw=0

Testing object functions                                                        
       PASSED
 h5ovisit_f 1 FAILED
 h5ovisit_f  1a FAILED
 h5ovisit_f 2 FAILED
 h5ovisit_f 2a FAILED
 h5ovisit_by_name_f 1 FAILED
 h5ovisit_by_name_f 1a FAILED
 Testing object visiting functions                                              
       *FAILED*

Which ones exactly can be seen with this patch:

--- ./fortran/test/tH5O_F03.F90.org     2025-01-02 11:39:56.228175966 +0000
+++ ./fortran/test/tH5O_F03.F90 2025-01-02 11:52:46.131359428 +0000
@@ -487,39 +487,39 @@
   udata%field = H5O_INFO_ALL_F
   udata%idx = 1
   CALL h5ovisit_f(fid, H5_INDEX_NAME_F, H5_ITER_INC_F, fun_ptr, f_ptr, 
ret_val, error)
-  CALL check("h5ovisit_f", error, total_error)
+  CALL check("h5ovisit_f 1", error, total_error)
   IF(ret_val.LT.0)THEN
-     CALL check("h5ovisit_f", -1, total_error)
+     CALL check("h5ovisit_f 1a", -1, total_error)
   ENDIF

   ! Test fields option
   udata%field = H5O_INFO_ALL_F
   udata%idx = 1
   CALL h5ovisit_f(fid, H5_INDEX_NAME_F, H5_ITER_INC_F, fun_ptr, f_ptr, 
ret_val, error, fields=udata%field)
-  CALL check("h5ovisit_f", error, total_error)
+  CALL check("h5ovisit_f 2", error, total_error)
   IF(ret_val.LT.0)THEN
-     CALL check("h5ovisit_f", -1, total_error)
+     CALL check("h5ovisit_f 2a", -1, total_error)
   ENDIF
   udata%field = H5O_INFO_BASIC_F
   udata%idx = 1
   CALL h5ovisit_f(fid, H5_INDEX_NAME_F, H5_ITER_INC_F, fun_ptr, f_ptr, 
ret_val, error, fields=udata%field)
-  CALL check("h5ovisit_f", error, total_error)
+  CALL check("h5ovisit_f 3", error, total_error)
   IF(ret_val.LT.0)THEN
-     CALL check("h5ovisit_f", -1, total_error)
+     CALL check("h5ovisit_f 3a", -1, total_error)
   ENDIF
   udata%field = H5O_INFO_TIME_F
   udata%idx = 1
   CALL h5ovisit_f(fid, H5_INDEX_NAME_F, H5_ITER_INC_F, fun_ptr, f_ptr, 
ret_val, error, fields=udata%field)
-  CALL check("h5ovisit_f", error, total_error)
+  CALL check("h5ovisit_f 4", error, total_error)
   IF(ret_val.LT.0)THEN
-     CALL check("h5ovisit_f", -1, total_error)
+     CALL check("h5ovisit_f 4a", -1, total_error)
   ENDIF
   udata%field = H5O_INFO_NUM_ATTRS_F
   udata%idx = 1
   CALL h5ovisit_f(fid, H5_INDEX_NAME_F, H5_ITER_INC_F, fun_ptr, f_ptr, 
ret_val, error, fields=udata%field)
-  CALL check("h5ovisit_f", error, total_error)
+  CALL check("h5ovisit_f 5", error, total_error)
   IF(ret_val.LT.0)THEN
-     CALL check("h5ovisit_f", -1, total_error)
+     CALL check("h5ovisit_f 5a", -1, total_error)
   ENDIF

   ! Test h5ovisit_by_name_f
@@ -527,32 +527,32 @@
   udata%idx = 1
   udata%field = H5O_INFO_ALL_F
   CALL h5ovisit_by_name_f(fid, object_name, H5_INDEX_NAME_F, H5_ITER_INC_F, 
fun_ptr, f_ptr, ret_val, error, fields=udata%field)
-  CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f", error, total_error)
+  CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f 1", error, total_error)
   IF(ret_val.LT.0)THEN
-     CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f", -1, total_error)
+     CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f 1a", -1, total_error)
   ENDIF

   ! Test fields option
   udata%idx = 1
   udata%field = H5O_INFO_BASIC_F
   CALL h5ovisit_by_name_f(fid, object_name, H5_INDEX_NAME_F, H5_ITER_INC_F, 
fun_ptr, f_ptr, ret_val, error, fields=udata%field)
-  CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f", error, total_error)
+  CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f 2", error, total_error)
   IF(ret_val.LT.0)THEN
-     CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f", -1, total_error)
+     CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f 2a", -1, total_error)
   ENDIF
   udata%idx = 1
   udata%field = H5O_INFO_TIME_F
   CALL h5ovisit_by_name_f(fid, object_name, H5_INDEX_NAME_F, H5_ITER_INC_F, 
fun_ptr, f_ptr, ret_val, error, fields=udata%field)
-  CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f", error, total_error)
+  CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f 3", error, total_error)
   IF(ret_val.LT.0)THEN
-     CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f", -1, total_error)
+     CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f 3a", -1, total_error)
   ENDIF
   udata%idx = 1
   udata%field =  H5O_INFO_NUM_ATTRS_F
   CALL h5ovisit_by_name_f(fid, object_name, H5_INDEX_NAME_F, H5_ITER_INC_F, 
fun_ptr, f_ptr, ret_val, error, fields=udata%field)
-  CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f", error, total_error)
+  CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f 4", error, total_error)
   IF(ret_val.LT.0)THEN
-     CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f", -1, total_error)
+     CALL check("h5ovisit_by_name_f 4a", -1, total_error)
   ENDIF

   CALL h5fclose_f(fid, error)


I tried to debug this, but I'm lacking too much fortran or hdf knowledge.
It seems the gmtime() function is involved.
Could it be caused by the fact that time_t is now 64bit on hppa.
Note: hppa is a big-endian 32-bit userspace platform.

Helge

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

Source: hdf5
Source-Version: 1.14.5+repack-3
Done: Gilles Filippini <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
hdf5, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gilles Filippini <[email protected]> (supplier of updated hdf5 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 16:14:18 +0100
Source: hdf5
Architecture: source
Version: 1.14.5+repack-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Gilles Filippini <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Gilles Filippini <[email protected]>
Closes: 1091911
Changes:
 hdf5 (1.14.5+repack-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New patch fortran_gmtime64.patch: fix fortran gmtime related
     failures on big-endian 32-bit architectures (closes: #1091911)
   * Update symbols files for alpha hppa hurd-i386 m68k powerpc sh4
Checksums-Sha1:
 88dfaa19b79993c3f4649641777667c7025faf43 3786 hdf5_1.14.5+repack-3.dsc
 a4d185d86c97c07d9ab5dfd5bba697fe6c0e3814 168012 
hdf5_1.14.5+repack-3.debian.tar.xz
 6172e9e37cb8a19b8e65c7825964e30a4017f66e 29729 
hdf5_1.14.5+repack-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 360f915a6116895a1bba75bf92bd2e9c1ace69e63b3622331d6fc783de543ff0 3786 
hdf5_1.14.5+repack-3.dsc
 284992575afb8755dd4ede8f75e2b83ac8d39644551665d94f7a0339f9eebca5 168012 
hdf5_1.14.5+repack-3.debian.tar.xz
 2fb314ead14ff1a05ff5ff3aa88adfd5170ccdfd6622023fa1975994e0575377 29729 
hdf5_1.14.5+repack-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 68bc02e9177c3ff2f91fa75792631ca3 3786 science optional hdf5_1.14.5+repack-3.dsc
 dfd73174294093c3454d463d2a8bd615 168012 science optional 
hdf5_1.14.5+repack-3.debian.tar.xz
 46b0ac56bea131a9cb365592c1515bab 29729 science optional 
hdf5_1.14.5+repack-3_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFEBAEBCgAuFiEEoJObzArDE05WtIyR7+hsbH/+z4MFAmd603cQHHBpbmlAZGVi
aWFuLm9yZwAKCRDv6Gxsf/7Pg3KjB/9JIzJoHVi5gA0I/tlpvVwqtheTq0LBAa9g
RrE0HHu/+nrH3T7sHoNJ5okP7twcOCT4yjMri7ueU976k13ZNT0AfpkakyU68WBv
G/F1Ozlyfv3/DMXGmThlwFWa/2pQTG4K6WQp0NVe99gqSCbzmW/OELG0tEFZ0mFF
WfP1F3ZrU7FCnQTqcB0eB/vLle1zNk+xfKJ7DT1IMX2rxL+bA80eXdAuqMD2pmlG
GGNdlvAMwh1MRgtNGQ9Ovd1GGXGp413tNpciluOZVKemc+ElPYn2XlrR7b2Tkxqu
NHTYRu/Tp9/7HUOsmgIEz0TRChjP20/n4yUHThmiOwgjbUIKU5Iq
=BIuP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgpNI0AScweD2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

Bug#1091911: marked as done (hdf5 FTBFS on hppa)

Reply via email to