Your message dated Sat, 11 Jan 2025 16:22:54 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059246,
regarding rust-laurel: add loongarch64 support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1059246: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059246
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rust-laurel
Version: 0.5.3-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch ftbfs
User: [email protected]
Usertags: loong64

Dear maintainers,

I have submitted the LoongArch architecture support in rust-laurel upstream [1], please see the pull-request link [2]. Please add support for loongarch64 (64-bit LoongArch) in rust-laurel source package.

Please consider the patch I have attached.
Your opinions are welcome.

[1]:https://github.com/threathunters-io/laurel
[2]:https://github.com/threathunters-io/laurel/pull/186

thanks,
Dandan Zhang

Description: Add loongarch64 support 
Last-Update: 2023-12-21

--- rust-laurel-0.5.3.orig/src/constants.rs
+++ rust-laurel-0.5.3/src/constants.rs
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ const ARCHS: &[(&str, u32)] = &[
     ("hexagon", 0x000000a4),
     ("i386", 0x40000003),
     ("ia64", 0xc0000032),
+    ("loongarch64", 0xc0000102),
     ("m32r", 0x00000058),
     ("m68k", 0x00000004),
     ("microblaze", 0x000000bd),

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
control: fixed -1 0.5.6-1
control: unblock -1 by 1092564

The patch (albeit incomplete) that this bug references had been merged
by me for Leurel 0.5.6.

It makes no sense to mark this bug as being blocked by pandoc being
missing, so let's try to undo that.

Cheers,
-Hilko

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to