Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:49:55 +0300
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#985923: qemu-user-static: Unknown privilege violation
(03) on 64-bit PowerPC targets when running java
has caused the Debian Bug report #985923,
regarding qemu-user-static: Unknown privilege violation (03) on 64-bit PowerPC
targets when running java
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
985923: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985923
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qemu-user-static
Version: 1:5.2+dfsg-9
Severity: normal
I’m getting…
Unknown privilege violation (03)
NIP 000000400b4192c8 LR 0000004002967638 CTR 000000400b419298 XER
0000000000000000 CPU#1
MSR 9000000102806901 HID0 0000000000000000 HF 9000000002806000 iidx 6 didx 6
TB 00010620 45613134064220
GPR00 0000000000000008 000000400330dc80 000000000000cafe 000000400330ee78
GPR04 0000000000000000 0000000000001ff8 0000000000000010 000000000000000a
GPR08 0000000000000030 000000400b419298 0000000000000001 000000000000c0de
GPR12 000000000000003f 00000040033188d0 0000000000000000 0000004001bbf9e8
GPR16 000000400b4192d8 0000004002d2bcf0 000000400b419298 000000400330ee78
GPR20 000000400b4192f8 0000004002d04178 00000000000003d8 0000004004009670
GPR24 0000004004009a48 000000400330dcf0 0000004004009660 000000400b419280
GPR28 0000004004009620 0000000000000080 0000004002cd8430 000000400330dc80
CR 240044f8 [ E G - - G G LO L ] RES ffffffffffffffff
… trying to run OpenJDK 8 on either ppc64 or…
Unknown privilege violation (03)
NIP 000000400b1b42b0 LR 00000040027ddfb8 CTR 000000400b1b4280 XER
0000000000000000 CPU#1
MSR 9000000102806901 HID0 0000000000000000 HF 9000000002806001 iidx 6 didx 6
TB 00010215 43873222717974
GPR00 ffffffbffcf55fa0 00000040030a9e70 0000004002a8ae00 00000040030ab060
GPR04 0000000000000000 0000000000002000 0000000000000010 0000000000000001
GPR08 0000000000000030 0000000000000001 0000004002adae00 0000000000000000
GPR12 000000400b1b4280 00000040030b48d0 0000004001b9f468 0000000000000000
GPR16 0000004001872000 0000004001b9f478 0000000000000000 00000040030ab060
GPR20 000000400b1b42c0 000000400b1b42c8 00000000000003d8 00000040040092b0
GPR24 0000004004009688 0000004002ab4430 00000040030a9ed0 00000040040092a0
GPR28 0000004004009260 000000400b1b4280 0000004002adc140 00000040030a9e70
CR 24884400 [ E G L L G G - - ] RES ffffffffffffffff
… ppc64el (release architecture); OpenJDK 11 is worse (it crashes after
this info; 8 only dumps then continues), and, given that the buildd logs
don’t contain this, it is almost certainly a qemu-user issue.
https://github.com/multiarch/qemu-user-static/issues/128 is another user
reporting this issue.
I retried exporting QEMU_CPU=POWER8 having learnt about its existence
while searching about this bug, it does not fix it though.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.8
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C.UTF-8
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
qemu-user-static depends on no packages.
Versions of packages qemu-user-static recommends:
ii binfmt-support 2.2.0-2
Versions of packages qemu-user-static suggests:
ii sudo 1.8.27-1+deb10u3
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:7.2+dfsg-1
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 05:31:12 +0100 Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> wrote:
Package: qemu-user-static
Version: 1:5.2+dfsg-9
Severity: normal
I’m getting…
Unknown privilege violation (03)
… trying to run OpenJDK 8 on either ppc64 or…
Unknown privilege violation (03)
… ppc64el (release architecture); OpenJDK 11 is worse (it crashes after
this info; 8 only dumps then continues), and, given that the buildd logs
don’t contain this, it is almost certainly a qemu-user issue.
It looks like this issue has been fixed in a later qemu version.
At least I can't reproduce it on bookworm version of qemu.
Closing this bug report now, - feel free to reopen it if you
think it is incorrect and the issue is still present.
Thanks,
/mjt
--- End Message ---
