Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2025 14:13:36 +0100 with message-id <caj3buotzf0mqgidd1flqpdpyajpmrm3xxjkslrimltbam+v...@mail.gmail.com> and subject line Re: Bug#691258: Missing / in RE for "reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size" has caused the Debian Bug report #691258, regarding bind rules - edns to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 691258: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691258 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.15 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, Got this log from time to time in System Events: Oct 23 13:48:16 pig2 named[28880]: success resolving '26.0/25.218.183.203.in-addr.arpa/PTR' (in '0/25.218.183.203.in-addr.arpa'?) after reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets Changing the regexp for the "(in '...'?)" part from: ^[[:alpha:]]{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: success resolving '[^[:space:]]+' \(in '[.[:alnum:]-]+'\?\) after (disabling EDNS|reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets)$ to: ^[[:alpha:]]{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: success resolving '[^[:space:]]+' \(in '[/.[:alnum:]-]+'\?\) after (disabling EDNS|reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets)$ fixed it (note addition of a "/"). Cheers, -- Loïc Minier
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---> On Fri, 31 May 2024 23:58:21 +0100 Richard Lewis > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:55:06 +0200 =?utf-8?B?TG/Dr2M=?= Minier > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Package: logcheck > > > Version: 1.3.15 > > > Severity: minor > > > Tags: patch > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Got this log from time to time in System Events: > > > Oct 23 13:48:16 pig2 named[28880]: success resolving > > > '26.0/25.218.183.203.in-addr.arpa/PTR' (in > > > '0/25.218.183.203.in-addr.arpa'?) after reducing the advertised EDNS UDP > > > packet size to 512 octets > > > > > > Changing the regexp for the "(in '...'?)" part from: > > > ^[[:alpha:]]{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: > > > success resolving '[^[:space:]]+' \(in '[.[:alnum:]-]+'\?\) after > > > (disabling EDNS|reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 > > > octets)$ > > > to: > > > ^[[:alpha:]]{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: > > > success resolving '[^[:space:]]+' \(in '[/.[:alnum:]-]+'\?\) after > > > (disabling EDNS|reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 > > > octets)$ > > > > > > > > > It's a shame no-one replied to this bug from 2012. > > > > A lot has changed in that time, and eg EDNS is now more common- i do > > remember seeing messages like this in the past, and adding locla > > rules, but i unless i am missing something i dont see these > > messages at all in journal or bind.log today, so perhaps this bug can be > > closed. > > > > (i may well be missing something - if these are in fact common then > > we should definitely filter them as there's not much you can do!) > A year later: closing, as no-one is arguing for a fix. I suspect this is an old message, but please reopen if there is something to do in trixie
--- End Message ---
