Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2025 13:56:48 +0000
with message-id
<---8Th2nrJbKhDW5ySXEZE2KfB90Od-aCMoXGEao9_ZvWyF7lM1lL_oUQ-2vELm0J35FFSaJM-E1IQRoW13vrqMyoJuszVyyvxsGqVUV_eg=@mindani.net>
and subject line Closing mistaken bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #1112644,
regarding [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#1111652: netatalk: Unable to using PAM in
centralized authentication scenario
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1112644: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1112644
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: netatalk
Hi Stefan,
Thank you for reporting the issue.
Can you please provide additional details how the centrally managed AD user
accounts are set up and integrated with PAM?
I want to try to reproduce your setup so that I can see the bug occur in
practice and try to trace where the failure occurs.
We didn't change the UAM code drastically between 3.1 and 4.2.
The only immediately relevant change would be a few lines that does additional
validation of the PAM account.
However those code paths don't match what we see in your logs.
These are the changes, in case you want to try reverting them and see if it
makes a difference.
https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk/pull/1935
https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk/pull/1937
Other potential lines of inquiry include:
- Some binary has the wrong file system permissions (we switched from Autotools
to Meson)
- The PAM configuration is wrong or incomplete (/etc/pam.d/netatalk)
- A bug in the libpam version in Trixie
Looking forward to your answer!
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This was meant as a response to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1111652
One day I might finally learn how this system works.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
