Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2025 21:29:08 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line New upstream is available
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090797,
regarding worker: Please consider updating to upstream version 5.1.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1090797: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1090797
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: worker
Version: 4.11.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I wanted to install worker from the testing repo.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Searched for worker in the testing repo
* What was the outcome of this action?
Found that worker was not available in the testing repo. In untable a outdated
version is available.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
That worker v5.1.0 (or anything slightly less recent) was in the testing repo.
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 6.11.10-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE,
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages worker depends on:
ii avfs 1.1.4-2
ii libc6 2.40-4
ii libdbus-1-3 1.16.0-1
ii libgcc-s1 14.2.0-8
ii liblua5.2-0 5.2.4-3+b3
ii libmagic1t64 [libmagic1] 1:5.45-3+b1
ii libstdc++6 14.2.0-8
ii libx11-6 2:1.8.10-2
ii libxft2 2.3.6-1+b3
ii worker-data 4.11.0-1
Versions of packages worker recommends:
ii imagemagick 8:7.1.1.39+dfsg1-3
ii imagemagick-7.q16 [imagemagick] 8:7.1.1.39+dfsg1-3
ii x11-utils 7.7+7
ii xli 1.17.0+20061110-10
worker suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.2.1-1
Hi,
this bug has been fixed already in February 2025, but I forgot to
include the bug number in the changelog.
Regards,
Tobias
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
