Your message dated Sat, 13 Sep 2025 10:19:42 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1114626: FTBFS against Octave 10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1114626,
regarding FTBFS against Octave 10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1114626: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1114626
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: octave-sockets
Version: 1.4.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs sid forky
User: [email protected]
Usertags: octave-10
octave-sockets FTBFS against octave 10 (which currently stands in experimental).
A build log is attached.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
octave-sockets_1.4.1-4.gz
Description: application/gzip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
* Sébastien Villemot <[email protected]> [2025-09-07 19:09]:
Source: octave-sockets
Version: 1.4.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs sid forky
User: [email protected]
Usertags: octave-10
octave-sockets FTBFS against octave 10 (which currently stands in experimental).
Hi,
I am hereby closing this bug report.
The octave-sockets package builds correctly against Octave 10 when using
version 1.10.3 of dh-octave or later, which is currently available in
unstable. The issue of dpkg-shlibdeps not finding the liboctmex shared
library has been resolved at the level of the octave sequence implemented
by dh-octave.
Best,
Rafael Laboissière
--- End Message ---
