Your message dated Tue, 02 Dec 2025 19:04:46 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1121064: fixed in insilicoseq 2.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1121064,
regarding insilicoseq: please make the build reproducible
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1121064: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1121064
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: insilicoseq
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: [email protected]
Usertags: nocheck
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]

Hi,

Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed that
insilicoseq could not be built reproducibly.

This was because it ships a different binary package depending
on whether the tests are run or not. This is caused by the testsuite
bumping the modification time of the data/ directory that then
gets installed via dh_installexamples.

Patch attached that ensures a consistent modification time for this
directory, regardless of nocheck.

 [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-
--- a/debian/rules      2025-11-19 12:30:55.967559205 -0800
--- b/debian/rules      2025-11-19 12:33:16.430132373 -0800
@@ -16,5 +16,7 @@
 endif
 
 override_dh_installexamples:
+       touch -d@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH) data/
        dh_installexamples
        find debian -name __pycache__ -type d | xargs rm -rf
+

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: insilicoseq
Source-Version: 2.0.1-2
Done: Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
insilicoseq, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> (supplier of updated insilicoseq package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 19:22:28 +0100
Source: insilicoseq
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team 
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>
Closes: 1121064
Changes:
 insilicoseq (2.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Chris Lamb ]
   * d/rules: force mtime of the data/ directory.
     This resolves problems of build reproducibility.  (Closes: #1121064)
 .
   [ Étienne Mollier ]
   * d/control: drop redundant Rules-Requires-Root: no.
   * d/control: declare compliance to standards version 4.7.2.
   * d/watch: convert to v5 Github template.
Checksums-Sha1:
 b9035c29a47b4be84db00e3ce2d4bfce412dc808 2411 insilicoseq_2.0.1-2.dsc
 11e086084e19f22236fd7216bda5583654f24daa 5412 insilicoseq_2.0.1-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 e06da767a3186b7057f98d93150edab49076b67f6768da52fae19b61b92b7ae8 2411 
insilicoseq_2.0.1-2.dsc
 efd8e78ebe03a32f7edb2d24ecda540f6d25df05af71dab4903dcab289764a76 5412 
insilicoseq_2.0.1-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 eaa9c2a3f2883a34b18797a8dc4a3bae 2411 science optional insilicoseq_2.0.1-2.dsc
 2d1e4fbb250ef642627a1f0b6792e3f5 5412 science optional 
insilicoseq_2.0.1-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=jQY5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpkV4Fw1QukO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to