Your message dated Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:44:02 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: daptup: Should daptup be removed from unstable?
has caused the Debian Bug report #1119340,
regarding RM: daptup -- RoM; unmaintained, basically unused
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1119340: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1119340
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: daptup
Version: 0.12.7+really0.12.7-0.1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[email protected]>, [email protected],
Package Salvaging Team <[email protected]>
Dear Eugene,
I suggest removing daptup from Debian for the following reasons:
* It is featuring a bug that is basically a reminder for yourself
which is not addressed since 15 years.
* There are quite few votes in popcon
https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=daptup&show_installed=on&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&want_ticks=on&from_date=&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1
* Last upload was 10 years ago
This bug serves as a pre-removal warning. After one month, the bug will be
reassigned to ftp.debian.org to actually request removal of the package.
In case the package should be removed from unstable, you may reassign this
bug report:
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: daptup -- RoM; unmaintained, basically unused
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:daptup
If you think the package might serve some interesting purpose inside
Debian but your interested moved away from this package it might make
sense to retitle this bug as Request for Adoption (RFA) to clarify its
status and hope that someone who is interested might take over.
In case you disagree with the above, please add a wontfix tag to this bug.
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
This package was highlighted in the Bug of the Day[1] initiative, which
aims to introduce newcomers to manageable tasks and guide them through
the workflow to solve them. The focus of this initiative is on migrating
packages to Salsa, as it's a great way to help newcomers become familiar
with a consistent Git-based workflow.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/qa/tiny_qa_tools/-/wikis/Tiny-QA-tasks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: forky/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), (5,
'experimental'), (1, 'buildd-experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.12.38+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=de_DE:de
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The package has no RC bug and does not FTBFS, so your reasoning for removal is
rather weak.
As you are not the maintainer of this package, I am closing this bug again.
Thorsten
--- End Message ---
