Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2026 20:45:15 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: RoQA: unmaintained, non-functional (Was: No pgadmin4 in
Debian? (Was: pfm: was succeeded by PostSqlForms (psf)))
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081711,
regarding RM: pfm -- RoQA; Orphaned upstream, unmaintained in Debian,
non-functional
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1081711: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081711
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pfm
Version: 2.0.8-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
psf
Last version AFAIK was v1.04 feb-2014.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/postsqlforms/
https://postsqlforms.sourceforge.net/en/index.html
pfm
https://web.archive.org/web/20191221111328/http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pfm/
https://web.archive.org/web/20170213185557/http://pfm.projects.pgfoundry.org/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.7
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-25-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Re: Mark Hindley
> Hello,
>
> This seems a bit rude to just do this without asking me first.
-> Andreas
> Christophe,
>
> I suppose you are referring to #1050375 from 2023, which was resolved?
Sorry if I went in the wrong direction here. I was afraid this was yet
another "let's fix something that is better removed" case and should
have rechecked the actual package status first.
> So, pfm works for me.
No reason to remove it then. I'm closing the bug.
Sorry for the trouble,
Christoph
--- End Message ---
