Your message dated Mon, 02 Feb 2026 18:04:51 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1076635: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #793939,
regarding publicfile-installer: [debconf_rewrite] Debconf templates and
debian/control review proposal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
793939: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793939
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: publicfile-installer
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
Dear Debian maintainer,
Hello,
I just noticed new or modified debconf templates appearing for this
package.
I would like to suggest you to consider calling for debconf templates
review AND translation updates when you introduce new debconf
templates or modify the existing templates in a package or, if you
prefer, to send a call for translations after uploading the first
version that introduces new templates or templates changes.
If you're interested in suggestions for doing this, you can find some
at the end of this bug report.
The debian-l10n-english team will now start a review, on our own
initiative. It will be conducted through this bug report.
Suggestions for future debconf templates review
------------------------------------------------
1) Getting debconf templates reviewed
--------------------------------------
The Debian i18n contributors have developed a set of suggestions for
the writing style of debconf templates, to give them an overall
consistency all around Debian. These writing style suggestions are
explained in the Developers Reference. Lintian also warns about common
writing style concerns.
Maintainers are welcome when they ask for a review of debconf templates
and/or packages descriptions on [email protected].
It is of course not needed to wait for someone (such as me right me)
proposing you such a review.
In such situations (whether the review is requested by the maintainer
or proposed by someone else), someone from the debian-l10n-english
team will pick up the review to do, handle it, and finally send you a
bug report with the suggested templates. If you want, you can ask for
being CC'ed to the various discussions when the templates are
reviewed.
2) Call for new translations
----------------------------
As soon as the templates have been reviewed, you can ask Debian
translators for new translations:
Just go to your package's build tree and use:
$ podebconf-report-po --call
This will propose you a generic mail which is to be sent to
[email protected] and call for new translations.
This utility will mention existing translations to avoid duplicate
work.
It will also attach the needed material to this mail.
Please also think about giving a deadline to translators. We like
deadlines..:-)
3) Always call for translation updates before uploading
-------------------------------------------------------
(of course only when you change the debconf templates!)
If your package already includes debconf translations (ie *.po files
in debian/po), please consider calling for translation updates if you
happen to change something in the templates...or just in case when you
release a new version.
This is done with the following command:
$ podebconf-report-po
This will build private mails to translators (ie people listed in
"Last-Translator" in the PO files) for translations that are
incomplete. These mails will included the needed PO file for each
translator.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.15+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package publicfile-installer has just been removed from the Debian
archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1076635
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.
Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
