Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:54:43 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1117239: Re: Can tesseract-ocr added as dependency?
has caused the Debian Bug report #1117239,
regarding Can tesseract-ocr added as dependency?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1117239: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1117239
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gimagereader-common
Version: 3.4.1-1
Severity: minor
or as recommends, since it's a frontend of it.
--
Sent with https://mailfence.com
Secure and private email
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Hi,
while I share the view, that it's not ideal that no tesseract languages
are installed by default, I fail to believe that installing
tesseract-ocr-eng by default makes things better. Ideally we'd ask the
user which language files to install, but that's not trivial to implement.
gImageReader has a built-in feature to at least point the user to the
needed package. From my pov that's enough already.
Best,
Philip
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
