Your message dated Mon, 02 Mar 2026 10:45:56 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1129407: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032252,
regarding baloo-kf5: baloo displays search results multiple times.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1032252: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032252
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: baloo-kf5
Version: 5.103.0-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The problem should be well known, e.g. it has been reported here over the years:
- https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419302
It has nothing to do with the underlying file system, here XFS.
It doesn't matter how often baloo's database is reset and
re-indexed, after a short time the duplicates will multiply
miraculously.
An example, after re-setting up the database yesterday evening using
"balooctl" I am already getting three (3) duplicate results this
morning on a directory and all "found" files.
In addition, the frontend, the file manager Dolphin, displays
results that were excluded using "excludeFolders".
I assumed Baloo was an integral part of KDE/Plasma, contrary to the
working Recoll, or did I misunderstand?
Or is the problem with my computer, because such problems over such
a long period of time would be noticed by the developers and
administrators who all work with it, right?
And while I'm here, krunner, the other GUI for Baloo, truncates the
filenames to fit /nicely into the picture/. The user is supposed to
guess?
I know you guys from the package management are not responsible for
the development, but maybe there is a possibility to mark such
packages as toy or experimental?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=de:en_GB:en_US
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages baloo-kf5 depends on:
ii init-system-helpers 1.65.2
ii kio 5.103.0-1
ii libc6 2.36-8
ii libkf5baloo5 5.103.0-2
ii libkf5balooengine5 5.103.0-2
ii libkf5configcore5 5.103.0-1
ii libkf5coreaddons5 5.103.0-1
ii libkf5crash5 5.103.0-1
ii libkf5dbusaddons5 5.103.0-1
ii libkf5filemetadata3 5.103.0-1
ii libkf5i18n5 5.103.0-1
ii libkf5idletime5 5.103.0-1
ii libkf5kiocore5 5.103.0-1
ii libkf5solid5 5.103.0-1
ii libqt5core5a 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii libqt5dbus5 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii libqt5gui5 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii libqt5qml5 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii libstdc++6 12.2.0-14
baloo-kf5 recommends no packages.
baloo-kf5 suggests no packages.
-- debconf-show failed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.116.0-1+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package baloo-kf5 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1129407
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.
Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
