Your message dated Wed, 4 Mar 2026 17:59:22 +0200
with message-id <aahW2mt2ChyCMh2a@localhost>
and subject line 0.9 is now in unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101325,
regarding nextpnr: New upstream release 0.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1101325: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101325
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:nextpnr
X-Debbugs-CC: Tarik Graba <[email protected]>
Hi Tarik,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 03:49:40PM +0100, Tarik Graba wrote:
> I do not know if you have noticed that there is a new release upstream of
> nextpnr?
>
> https://github.com/YosysHQ/nextpnr/releases/tag/nextpnr-0.8
I started packaging earlier today. Current blocker is that I'm undecided on
is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101323.
Upstream import and WIP packaging is already in salsa if you want to help:
$ gbp clone https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team/nextpnr
> > The important change is that they removed nextpnr-gowin which is
> supposed to be replaced by nextpnr-himbaechel supporting Gowin FPGAs. I
> did not test this as I do not have Gowin FPGAs.
Right I've been mulling whether I should Conflict+Replaces nextpnr-gowin
with nextpnr-himbaechel-gowin (symlinks) or not. Digging into what the
cmdline differences are would be useful!
> I do not know what is the impact of this on Debian packaging and if I
> should open a bug report (at least for tracking the process).
Someone has to do it and it's always good to send a friendly "please
package new upstream version" bug if there isn't one already.
Actually helps grease the wheels process wise in most cases so you should
always do that :-).
If my BTS-foo doesn't fail me this mail should open a bugreport. Let's see.
> Thanks for your work maintaining the free FPGA toolchain on Debian.
<3
--Daniel
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9-1
nextpnr (0.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream version 0.9
...
-- Daniel Gröber <[email protected]> Sun, 01 Mar 2026 21:11:04 +0100
--- End Message ---
