Your message dated Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:11:38 -0500
with message-id <3876131.MHq7AAxBmi@riemann>
and subject line Re: Bug#1130163: nmu: vtk9_9.5.2+dfsg4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1130163,
regarding nmu: vtk9_9.5.2+dfsg4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1130163: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1130163
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:vtk9
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu vtk9_9.5.2+dfsg4-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild to capture updated Boost
library default version. At build time, vtk captures the version of Boost
libraries used in its build and generates a cmake file used in downstream
builds that looks for that precise version of boost. The boost defaults have
recently changed - which makes downstream builds fail (e.g. ITK, Elastix,
ANTS). A re-built VTK will pick up the latest boost default."
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Monday, March 9, 2026 12:44:12 p.m. Central Daylight Time Anton Gladky
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have found the reason and prepared a fix.
> vtk9 has not direct dependency on boost, but it is transitive.
>
> I am uploading it with the explicit versioning. BinNMU can resolve
> it but I want to have a reliable fix.
Sounds good. Cancelling the nmu request.
-Steve
>
> Regards
>
> Anton
>
> Am Mo., 9. März 2026 um 18:40 Uhr schrieb Steven Robbins <[email protected]>:
> > On Monday, March 9, 2026 11:13:09 a.m. Central Daylight Time Sebastian
Ramacher wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Steve
> > >
> > > On 2026-03-09 08:43:22 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > >
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > >
> > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > Control: affects -1 + src:vtk9
> > > >
> > > > User: [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > Usertags: binnmu
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > nmu vtk9_9.5.2+dfsg4-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild to capture
> > > > updated
> > > >
> > > > Boost library default version. At build time, vtk captures the
> > > > version
> > > >
> > > > of Boost libraries used in its build and generates a cmake file used
> > > > in
> > > >
> > > > downstream builds that looks for that precise version of boost. The
> > > >
> > > > boost defaults have recently changed - which makes downstream builds
> > > > fail
> > > >
> > > > (e.g. ITK, Elastix, ANTS). A re-built VTK will pick up the latest
> > > > boost
> > > >
> > > > default."
> > >
> > > I am unable to find these boost dependencies in the -dev packages of
> > >
> > > vtk9.
> >
> > You're right. In fact, I don't even see build-depends on boost packages.
> > That seems strange to me. I've cc'd the active maintainers: should there
> > be a build-depends on boost packages?
> >
> >
> > -Steve
> >
> > > If there is such a tight requirement on the installed boost
> > >
> > > version, why doesn't it have dependencies on the boost version it was
> > >
> > > built with?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
