Your message dated Sat, 21 Mar 2026 00:04:33 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1127179: fixed in codeblocks 25.03+dfsg-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1127179,
regarding codeblocks: libboost-system-dev package is obsolete with boost 1.89
and newer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1127179: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1127179
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:codeblocks
Version: 25.03+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid forky
User: [email protected]
Usertags: boost1.90
This package either build-depends on libboost-system-dev or depends on it.
The boost system library was removed upstream in 1.89, and is empty since 1.69.
If this library is referenced in the build system, the library can just be
removed from the build system, and the package should continue to build
for any boost version newer than 1.69, including boost1.83 in Debian.
There is no need to wait until boost 1.90 becomes the default, the issue
can be addressed in unstable. Issues to check:
- Remove libboost-system-dev in Depends and Build-Depends.
- Adjust autopkg tests and test dependencies if needed.
- Scan the build system if the library is used, and remove it
from the build system. https://www.boost.org/releases/1.89.0/
has a short paragraph how to do that for cmake.
boost1.90 is now available in unstable, and a boost-defaults
defaulting to 1.90 is available in experimental. Please also check
that the package builds with boost 1.90.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: codeblocks
Source-Version: 25.03+dfsg-2.1
Done: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
codeblocks, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> (supplier of updated codeblocks package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 20:08:46 +0200
Source: codeblocks
Architecture: source
Version: 25.03+dfsg-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: David Paleino <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Closes: 1127179
Changes:
codeblocks (25.03+dfsg-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Fix FTBFS with Boost 1.90. (Closes: #1127179)
* Remove obsolete -std=gnu++14 workaround.
Checksums-Sha1:
8834db73bf321c826cbdb800d9acc474f6ac556b 2520 codeblocks_25.03+dfsg-2.1.dsc
e9283156d8957c21e1102ca9057d284e415dff13 27340
codeblocks_25.03+dfsg-2.1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
c3920bf6095f7a4b9532204c835ef3eb8f20e2d081cbaa941b8d70a051061811 2520
codeblocks_25.03+dfsg-2.1.dsc
65da598ac83f81ed5245246be28e6727c4b200ee15d2abd295bfe0f5b0f66767 27340
codeblocks_25.03+dfsg-2.1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
a7e49e756510f39570bc88d841585515 2520 x11 optional
codeblocks_25.03+dfsg-2.1.dsc
e49242e0d66c15965ab87dcab5906c62 27340 x11 optional
codeblocks_25.03+dfsg-2.1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=/FWq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpRk6QpCwkFU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
