Your message dated Mon, 23 Mar 2026 13:38:19 -0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1130751: RFS: pyuvm/4.0.1-1 [ITP] -- python
implementation of UVM
has caused the Debian Bug report #1130751,
regarding RFS: pyuvm/4.0.1-1 [ITP] -- python implementation of UVM
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1130751: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1130751
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hello,
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyuvm":
* Package name : pyuvm
Version : 4.0.1
Upstream Author : Ray Salemi <[email protected]>
* URL : https://github.com/pyuvm/pyuvm/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : python implementation of UVM
The source builds the following binary packages:
python3-pyuvm - Python implementation of the UVM using cocotb
Changes for the initial release:
pyuvm (4.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #1041285)
The package has the following lintian issues:
I: pyuvm source: older-debian-watch-file-standard 4 [debian/watch]
I: python3-pyuvm: wrong-section-according-to-package-name electronics => python
The package can be found on Git:
https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team/pyuvm
Regards,
--
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
Digital design engineer
GPG KeyIDs: 4096R/A7EF5671 2048R/EDDDA1B7
GPG Fingerprints:
6E2E E4BB 72E2 F417 D066 6ABF 7B30 B496 A7EF 5761
8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Thanks, uploaded!
Please add a tag in the salsa repo yourself, I don't have write access
there.
> > * d/gbp.conf: re the above, you might want to add a pristine-tar
> > setting here?
>
> I don't understand the issue here.
Missing releases on that branch often result from forgetting to add
the --pristine-tar option when running 'gbp import-orig' or similar,
which can made a default by adding the relevant setting in d/gbp.conf.
In this case though, everything appears to have been in place already
and the only thing missing was the 'git push' for the pristine-tar
branch.
pgphwgXyQ9t5X.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
