Your message dated Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:29:12 +0800
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line fixed in new upstream version jpeg-xl
has caused the Debian Bug report #1129972,
regarding libjxl-testdata breaks jpeg-xl autopkgtest
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1129972: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1129972
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libjxl-testdata, jpeg-xl
Control: found -1 libjxl-testdata/0.0~git20250513.73695d3-2
Control: found -1 jpeg-xl/0.11.1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid forky
User: [email protected]
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainer(s),

With a (not so) recent upload of libjxl-testdata the autopkgtest of jpeg-xl fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of libjxl-testdata from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular form:

                       pass            fail
libjxl-testdata        from testing    0.0~git20250513.73695d3-2
jpeg-xl                from testing    0.11.1-6
all others             from testing    from testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of libjxl-testdata to testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and reassign the bug to the right package?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libjxl-testdata

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/j/jpeg-xl/69289109/log.gz

 72s Running Tests
 72s Test - Compression Ratio
 73s JPEG XL encoder v0.11.1 [AVX2,SSE4,SSE2]
 73s Encoding [VarDCT, d1.000, effort: 7]
 73s Compressed to 521.5 kB including container (1.217 bpp).
 73s 2268 x 1512,  11.406 MP/s [11.41, 11.41], , 1 reps, 48 threads.
 73s JPEG XL file format container (ISO/IEC 18181-2)
 73s JPEG XL image, 2268x1512, lossy, 8-bit RGB
 73s Brotli-compressed Exif metadata: 12074 compressed bytes
 73s Brotli-compressed xml  metadata: 673 compressed bytes
73s Color space: RGB, D65, sRGB primaries, sRGB transfer function, rendering intent: Perceptual
 73s JPEG XL decoder v0.11.1 [AVX2,SSE4,SSE2]
 73s Decoded to pixels.
 73s 2268 x 1512,  137.246 MP/s [137.25, 137.25], , 1 reps, 48 threads.
 73s Invalid compression size: 521539
 73s Test - Lossless Roundtrip
 73s JPEG XL encoder v0.11.1 [AVX2,SSE4,SSE2]
 73s Reading image data failed.
 74s autopkgtest [13:17:07]: test run-unit-test

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This bug fixed in new upstream version jpeg-xl 0.11.2-0.1


-- 
肖盛文 xiao sheng wen -- Debian Developer(atzlinux)
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=atzlinux%40debian.org
GnuPG Public Key: 0x00186602339240CB

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to