Your message dated Thu, 14 May 2026 22:23:28 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line autoconf fixed in sid
has caused the Debian Bug report #1133583,
regarding octave-general: ftbfs with GCC-16
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1133583: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1133583
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:octave-general
Version: 2.1.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid forky ftbfs
User: [email protected]
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-16

Hi,

octave-general fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 and arm64 with
gcc-16/g++-16, but builds properly with gcc-15/g++-15. The severity of this
report will be raised before the forky release.

The full build log can be found at:
https://people.debian.org/~ema/gcc-16-rebuilds/output-1/octave-general_arm64.build.xz

The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.

To build with GCC 16, either set CC=gcc-16 CXX=g++-16 explicitly,
or install the gcc, g++, gfortran, ... packages from experimental.

  apt-get -t=experimental install g++ 

Common build failures include unused (but set) variables, array subscripts
partly outside array bounds, and new/dropped symbols in Debian symbols files.
For other C/C++ related build failures see the porting guide at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-16/porting_to.html

Please only close this issue after double-checking that the package can be
built correctly with GCC 16.

Please do not reassign this bug to another package. If a fix in another package
is required, then file a bug for the other package (or clone), and mark this
bug as blocked by the bug in the other package.

[...]


  133 |                     curr_scope.assign (fld_names(i), map.contents 
(iter));
      |                                ^~~~~~
unpackfields.cc:166:28: error: ‘octave::symbol_table::scope’ {aka ‘class 
octave::symbol_scope’} has no member named ‘assign’
  166 |                 curr_scope.assign (fld_names(i), val);
      |                            ^~~~~~
packfields.cc: In function ‘octave_value_list Fpackfields(octave::interpreter&, 
const octave_value_list&, int)’:
packfields.cc:63:10: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘class 
octave::interpreter’
   63 |        = interp.require_current_scope ("packfields");
      |          ^~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave/../octave/ov.h:71,
                 from /usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave/../octave/ovl.h:38,
                 from /usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave/../octave/ov-fcn.h:37,
                 from 
/usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave/../octave/ov-builtin.h:35,
                 from 
/usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave/../octave/defun-int.h:33,
                 from 
/usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave/../octave/defun-dld.h:35,
                 from /usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave/../octave/oct.h:36,
                 from packfields.cc:17:
/usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave/../octave/oct-stream.h:53:7: note: forward 
declaration of ‘class octave::interpreter’
   53 | class interpreter;
      |       ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from packfields.cc:20:
config.h:22:34: error: ‘valid_identifier’ was not declared in this scope; did 
you mean ‘octave::valid_identifier’?
   22 | #define OCTAVE__VALID_IDENTIFIER valid_identifier
      |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
packfields.cc:75:13: note: in expansion of macro ‘OCTAVE__VALID_IDENTIFIER’
   75 |       if (! OCTAVE__VALID_IDENTIFIER (struct_name))
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave/../octave/oct.h:42:
/usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave/../octave/utils.h:47:27: note: 
‘octave::valid_identifier’ declared here
   47 | extern OCTINTERP_API bool valid_identifier (const std::string& s);
      |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
config.h:22:34: error: ‘valid_identifier’ was not declared in this scope; did 
you mean ‘octave::valid_identifier’?
   22 | #define OCTAVE__VALID_IDENTIFIER valid_identifier
      |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
packfields.cc:91:15: note: in expansion of macro ‘OCTAVE__VALID_IDENTIFIER’
   91 |           if (OCTAVE__VALID_IDENTIFIER (fld_name))
      |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave/../octave/utils.h:47:27: note: 
‘octave::valid_identifier’ declared here
   47 | extern OCTINTERP_API bool valid_identifier (const std::string& s);
      |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
packfields.cc:99:49: error: ‘octave::symbol_table::scope’ {aka ‘class 
octave::symbol_scope’} has no member named ‘varval’
   99 |               octave_value fld_val = curr_scope.varval (fld_name);
      |                                                 ^~~~~~
packfields.cc:123:44: error: ‘octave::symbol_table::scope’ {aka ‘class 
octave::symbol_scope’} has no member named ‘varval’
  123 |       octave_value struct_val = curr_scope.varval (struct_name);
      |                                            ^~~~~~
config.h:25:18: error: ‘class octave_value’ has no member named ‘is_map’
   25 | #define OV_ISMAP is_map
      |                  ^~~~~~
packfields.cc:130:50: note: in expansion of macro ‘OV_ISMAP’
  130 |       if (struct_val.is_defined () && struct_val.OV_ISMAP ())
      |                                                  ^~~~~~~~
packfields.cc:142:18: error: ‘octave::symbol_table::scope’ {aka ‘class 
octave::symbol_scope’} has no member named ‘assign’
  142 |       curr_scope.assign (struct_name, struct_val);
      |                  ^~~~~~
make[1]: *** [Makefile:33: mark_for_deletion.oct] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [Makefile:33: unpackfields.oct] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:33: packfields.oct] Error 1
g++ -I/usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave/.. -I/usr/include/octave-11.1.0/octave  
-pthread -fopenmp -g -O2 
-ffile-prefix-map=/build/reproducible-path/octave-general-2.1.4=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -mbranch-protection=standard -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g  -O2 
-ffile-prefix-map=/build/reproducible-path/octave-general-2.1.4=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -mbranch-protection=standard -o SHA1.oct  
/tmp/oct-oYrYoC.o   -Wl,-z,relro -lnettle -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -Wl,-z,relro  
-flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -Wl,-z,relro 
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/oct-n7cXSz/octave-general-2.1.4/src'

error: pkg: error running 'make' for the general package
error: called from
    configure_make at line 121 column 9
    install at line 202 column 7
    pkg at line 692 column 9
    /usr/share/dh-octave/install-pkg.m at line 45 column 1
dh_auto_install: error: octave --no-gui --no-history --silent --no-init-file 
--no-window-system /usr/share/dh-octave/install-pkg.m 
/build/reproducible-path/octave-general-2.1.4/debian/octave-general/usr/share/octave/packages
 
/build/reproducible-path/octave-general-2.1.4/debian/octave-general/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/octave/packages
 returned exit code 1
make: *** [debian/rules:5: binary] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess failed with exit 
status 2

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

these bugs were blocked by #1133694 in autoconf.

autoconf 0.73-1 was fixed and 0.73-2 got uploaded to unstable now so those bugs 
can be closed.
(I also closed the autoconf one properly now)

Regards,

Rene

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to