Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2026 22:25:59 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#926849: Generate treeinfo files to ease automatic 
installations
has caused the Debian Bug report #926849,
regarding Generate treeinfo files to ease automatic installations
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
926849: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926849
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hi,
in order to ease fully automatic installation in tools like gnome-boxes,
virt-manager or OpenStack it would be nice to have some additional
metadata to make it simpler for tools like libosinfo (or other tools
using the same information) to identify the installation tree.

Fedora and OpenSUSE came up with treeinfo files in the installer
directories of their repository servers. There was some discussion about
this on debian-devel a while back [0].

E.g. for amd64 and stretch we'd have a file

   http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stretch/main/installer-amd64/.treeinfo

looking like

    [checksums]
    current/images/netboot/mini.iso = sha256:...
    current/images/netboot/debian-installer/amd64/initrd.gz = sha256:...
    current/images/netboot/debian-installer/amd64/linux = sha256: ...
    
    [general]
    arch = x86_64
    family = Debian
    name = Debian Stretch
    version = 9.8.0
    platforms = x86_64
    
    [images-x86_64]
    boot.iso = current/images/netboot/mini.iso
    initrd = current/images/netboot/debian-installer/amd64/initrd.gz
    kernel = current/images/netboot/debian-installer/amd64/linux

The layout is described at [1]. Some terms are blurry e.g. platform so
I'll look into clarifying these and make things match our requirements
as well.

I don't have experience with these parts of the archive software yet but
would look into providing the necessary changes at some point.
Cheers,
 -- Guido

[0]: 
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/cak9pz9+d2w2+5x1nwe_+vxhmafoke3gehrycudphm38ykx7...@mail.gmail.com
[1]: https://release-engineering.github.io/productmd/treeinfo-1.0.html

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing as there has been no follow-up for over seven years.

Ansgar

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to