Your message dated Sat, 1 Aug 2026 20:17:50 +0900 with message-id <CA+sCei2t9MJhkhdW-uNy+gAHNUWfnudE05fD=q0avakanfc...@mail.gmail.com> and subject line Re: debian-i18n: [i18n l10n-pkg-status] dl10n-check flags missing Priority as error, contradicting Policy 4.7.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1143203, regarding debian-i18n: [i18n l10n-pkg-status] dl10n-check flags missing Priority as error, contradicting Policy 4.7.3 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 1143203: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1143203 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: debian-i18n Severity: normal Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] Dear Maintainer, Since Debian Policy 4.7.3 the Priority field defaults to "optional" and is recommended to be omitted from the source stanza: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities dl10n-check, which generates the l10n-pkg-status pages on i18n.debian.org, still treats a missing Priority as an error: source does not specify a priority Every package following current Policy is therefore marked as errored, and the error propagates to tracker.debian.org as an "action needed" item. Affected examples: cppi, vim, gnome-shell, geeqie, kdenlive: https://i18n.debian.org/l10n-pkg-status/c/cppi.html A fix already exists. Simon Josefsson posted a patch in January 2026 (thread "cppi: i18n.debian.org: source does not specify a priority" on debian-i18n) and opened a merge request: https://salsa.debian.org/l10n-team/dl10n/-/merge_requests/11 Two actions are needed: 1. Merge !11 in salsa l10n-team/dl10n 2. Deploy the updated dl10n-check on i18n.debian.org so the daily regeneration stops emitting the error Happy to help test, or to assist with dl10n maintenance if extra hands are welcome.
0001-let-missing-priority-mean-optional.patch
Description: application/mbox
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---I see that commit 28670fc ("Let missing Priority field mean optional") was merged to master branch in l10n-team/dl10n, and the new l10n-pkg-status generated today no longer emits the error. Thank you!
--- End Message ---
