Your message dated Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:06:43 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1147652: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1147652,
regarding RM: gnome-chemistry-utils -- RoQA; unbuildable since removal of 
libosmesa
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1147652: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1147652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:gnome-chemistry-utils
Control: block -1 by 1147651
User: [email protected]
Usertags: remove

gnome-chemistry-utils requires Mesa's libosmesa, which was removed in 
2025 (Mesa 25.1.0) and is no longer available. The most recent version 
of Mesa that still built libosmesa used llvm-toolchain-19, so this is 
one of the factors keeping llvm-toolchain-19 in unstable.

The most recent maintainer upload of gnome-chemistry-utils was in 2021 
and there have been three NMUs since then. The most recent upstream 
release was in 2018.

Its only reverse-dependency appears to be gfsview, for which I requested 
removal in #1147651 - if the ftp team goes ahead with removal, then that 
one will need to be processed first.

As with gfsview, if these packages are still desired in Debian, I think 
the only way to provide them would be to introduce the equivalent of 
Ubuntu's src:mesa-compat (a separate source package containing an 
outdated version of Mesa that only builds the libraries that were 
subsequently removed upstream), after which these packages could be 
re-introduced; but in the absence of someone introducing and maintaining 
that package, I think it's time to remove these.

(This was prompted by packages that directly or indirectly depend on 
llvm-toolchain-19 being proposed for autoremoval from testing.)

    smcv

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

gchempaint | 0.14.17-6.3+b1 | amd64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
gchempaint | 0.14.17-6.3+b2 | arm64
  gcrystal | 0.14.17-6.3+b1 | amd64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
  gcrystal | 0.14.17-6.3+b2 | arm64
   gcu-bin | 0.14.17-6.3+b1 | amd64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
   gcu-bin | 0.14.17-6.3+b2 | arm64
gnome-chemistry-utils | 0.14.17-6.3 | source
 libgcu0v5 | 0.14.17-6.3+b1 | amd64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 libgcu0v5 | 0.14.17-6.3+b2 | arm64

------------------- Reason -------------------
RoQA; unbuildable since removal of libosmesa
----------------------------------------------

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1147652

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to