Your message dated Sun, 27 Sep 2026 14:51:21 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: reverse dependencies
has caused the Debian Bug report #1147492,
regarding RM: ruby-google-protobuf/experimental -- RoM; versioning change
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1147492: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1147492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ruby-google-protobuf
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Version: 36.0~rc1-1
Severity: normal
Hi FTP Masters,
Versioning of Protobuf changed. Source version had a big jump and
language bindings have a smaller, different version number on their
own now. First it was not taken into account, but now I need to upload
the correct, smaller binary version.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> there are reverse dependencies that need to be taken care of:
>
>
> Checking reverse dependencies...
> # Broken Depends:
> grpc: python3-grpcio
> janitor: python3-janitor
> onnx: python3-onnx [amd64 arm64 armhf i386 loong64 ppc64el s390x]
> onnxruntime: python3-onnxruntime
>
> # Broken Build-Depends:
> libssc: python3-protobuf
> onnx: python3-protobuf
> onnxruntime: python3-protobuf
I don't think broken rdeps matter for removal from experimental: the
rdeps would usually take the package from unstable. And even if it
breaks packages in experimental, I don't think it should be an issue.
I cleaned up protobuf/experimental as part of #1148788.
Ansgar
--- End Message ---
