Your message dated Thu, 01 Oct 2026 17:27:05 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1149591: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1149591,
regarding RM: ninix-kagari [s390x] -- RoQA; depends on webkit2gtk which no 
longer supports big-endian
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1149591: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1149591
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:ninix-kagari
Control: block 1148038 by -1
User: [email protected]
Usertags: remove
User: [email protected]
Usertags: s390x

WebKitGTK can no longer work on big-endian architectures as a result of an 
upstream move from Cairo to Skia, as announced in 
<https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2026/09/msg00139.html> and 
#1148038. The latest WebKitGTK security advisory lists around 200 CVEs, 
so it seems dangerous to hold it back to an older version for longer 
than is strictly necessary.

ninix-kagari is a desktop mascot (toy) that Depends on ruby-gtk4, which 
is part of ruby-gnome, which is one of the packages blocking the new 
webkit2gtk version. I find it very difficult to imagine that anyone is 
genuinely running this program on a room-sized IBM mainframe, so I 
suggest that we remove it from s390x in order to simplify the dependency 
graph and clear the way for potential removal of ruby-gnome.

It is a leaf package:

>smcv@coccia ~ % dak rm --no-action --rdep-check --partial -as390x ninix-kagari
...
>No dependency problem found.

and is already not present in testing as a result of #1141018.

Thanks,
    smcv

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

ninix-kagari |    2.6.0-2 | s390x

------------------- Reason -------------------
RoQA; depends on webkit2gtk which no longer supports big-endian
----------------------------------------------

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1149591

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to