Your message dated Wed, 7 Oct 2026 18:36:58 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1149793: gnupg1: recommends libldap-2.5-0 which is not
in unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1149793,
regarding gnupg1: recommends libldap-2.5-0 which is not in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1149793: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1149793
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: gnupg1: recommends libldap-2.5-0 which is not in unstable
Package: gnupg1
Version: 1.4.23-3
Usertags: package-relations package-relations-recommends
Severity: wishlist
Dear maintainer(s),
I noticed that package gnupg1 recommends libldap-2.5-0, which is
currently not available in unstable.
I see that the source package openldap in version 2.6.2+dfsg-1~exp1 (May
2022) made this changes:
https://salsa.debian.org/openldap-team/openldap/-/blob/master/debian/changelog?ref_type=heads#L327
----------
[...]
- d/control: New binary package libldap2. Remove binary package
libldap-2.5-0. Adjust package relationships (Depends, Replaces) due
[...]
----------
I don't know if gnupg1 should now recommend libldap2, something else or
drop the recommends.
Thank you for your time,
PS[0]: I am developing a tool to detect such issues:
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations . Reports are
manually reviewed before submission. If you would prefer not to receive
such reports (for specific packages, all of your maintained packages,
etc.), please let me know. Any other feedback is welcomed as well. No
more bugreports for this missing relation will be sent.
PS[1]: more information available in
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/README.md
and
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/docs/bug-report-extra-info.md
--
Carles Pina i Estany
https://carles.pina.cat | [email protected] | [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2026-10-03 Carles Pina i Estany <[email protected]> wrote:
> Subject: gnupg1: recommends libldap-2.5-0 which is not in unstable
> Package: gnupg1
> Version: 1.4.23-3
> Usertags: package-relations package-relations-recommends
> Severity: wishlist
> Dear maintainer(s),
> I noticed that package gnupg1 recommends libldap-2.5-0, which is
> currently not available in unstable.
> I see that the source package openldap in version 2.6.2+dfsg-1~exp1 (May
> 2022) made this changes:
> https://salsa.debian.org/openldap-team/openldap/-/blob/master/debian/changelog?ref_type=heads#L327
> ----------
> [...]
> - d/control: New binary package libldap2. Remove binary package
> libldap-2.5-0. Adjust package relationships (Depends, Replaces) due
> [...]
> ----------
> I don't know if gnupg1 should now recommend libldap2, something else or
> drop the recommends.
[...]
This has been fixed by rebuilding gnupg1 (binNMU - See #1149936).
Thank, cu Andreas
--- End Message ---
