Your message dated Thu, 8 Oct 2026 11:15:29 +0900
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1150287: [bookworm] no Priority
has caused the Debian Bug report #1150287,
regarding [bookworm] no Priority
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1150287: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1150287
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: webkit2gtk
Version: 2.50.6-1~deb12u1
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Hi,
the packages in bookworm don't have a Priority field, but this is still
required for bookworm and only optional (heh) for trixie and above.
This is very annoying because I'm building the whole of bookworm for
riscv64, and this package requires manual attention on every update.
Simon
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 13.7
APT prefers stable-security
APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: riscv64
Kernel: Linux 5.15.0-starfive (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On 10/8/26 11:07 AM, Simon Richter wrote:
the packages in bookworm don't have a Priority field, but this is still
required for bookworm and only optional (heh) for trixie and above.
Nevermind, it's only the package in bookworm-security, the one in
bookworm itself is fine, and I suspect that any future security updates
will be based on that.
Simon
--- End Message ---
