Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2026 00:48:39 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: onesixtyone uses pidof but does not depend on procps
has caused the Debian Bug report #1136540,
regarding onesixtyone uses pidof but does not depend on procps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1136540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1136540
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: onesixtyone
Version: 0.3.4-1
Usertags: pidof-without-procps
Dear maintainer(s) of onesixtyone,
it appears that onesixtyone uses `pidof` in its testsuite, or that
at least one of its binary packages uses `pidof` at runtime.
Historically, `pidof` was provided by the Essential package
`sysvinit-tools`, making an explicit dependency unnecessary. However
`pidof` will soon be moved to `procps` and will no longer be part of
the Essential set.
Please add an explicit dependency on `procps`:
* via the `Depends:` field of all binary packages of onesixtyone
that use `pidof` at runtime;
* via the `Build-Depends:` field of onesixtyone, if `pidof` is
used in tests run at build-time;
* via the `Depends:` field of `debian/control/tests`, if `pidof` is
used in autopkgtests.
To prevent any disruption for users of onesixtyone, please add
this dependency now, before `pidof` is moved from `sysvinit-utils` to
`procps`. Alternatively, you could remove all uses of `pidof`.
It is believed that onesixtyone uses `pidof` due to the following
code snippets:
```
path: onesixtyone_0.3.4-1/dotest.sh
#!/bin/bash
pidof snmpd || { echo "snmpd not running?"; exit 1; }
result=$(./onesixtyone 127.0.0.1)
```
Feel free to close this issue if this is a false positive (for example
if this code is in an unreachable code path).
Regards,
--
Gioele Barabucci
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: fixed -1 0.3.4-1
On Thu, 14 May 2026 01:29:54 +0200 Gioele Barabucci <[email protected]>
wrote:
It is believed that onesixtyone uses `pidof` due to the following
code snippets:
```
path: onesixtyone_0.3.4-1/dotest.sh
#!/bin/bash
pidof snmpd || { echo "snmpd not running?"; exit 1; }
result=$(./onesixtyone 127.0.0.1)
```
Closing: pidof is only used in a script meant for CIs and not used in
Debian.
This was a false positive.
Regards
--
Gioele Barabucci
--- End Message ---
