Your message dated Tue, 20 Oct 2026 21:40:23 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1151427: sudo: /etc/sudoers.d is 0755 while upstream 
installs the directory as 0750
has caused the Debian Bug report #1151427,
regarding sudo: /etc/sudoers.d is 0755 while upstream installs the directory as 
0750
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1151427: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1151427
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sudo
Version: 1.9.17p2-9
Severity: important

Hello,

Upstream installs the /etc/sudoers.d directory with the mode 0750 while
the debian package installs it as 0755.

Shouldn't we follow upstream here?

Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville

-- System Information:
Debian Release: forky/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 7.2.11+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=fr_BE:fr
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages sudo depends on:
ii  libapparmor1    4.1.8-3
ii  libaudit1       1:4.2.1-1
ii  libc6           2.43-7
ii  libpam-modules  1.7.0-8
ii  libpam0g        1.7.0-8
ii  libselinux1     3.11-2.1
ii  libssl3t64      3.6.5-1
ii  zlib1g          1:1.3.dfsg+really1.3.2-3

sudo recommends no packages.

sudo suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/sudoers [Errno 13] Permission non accordée: '/etc/sudoers'

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 06:01:34PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Upstream installs the /etc/sudoers.d directory with the mode 0750 while
the debian package installs it as 0755.

Shouldn't we follow upstream here?

No, Debian policy trumps upstream here. There is no reason to break sudo¹
in sudo.

Greetings
Marc

¹ having 750 directories breaks tab completion and shell globbing

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany    |  lose things."    Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to