Your message dated Sun, 25 Oct 2026 01:08:53 -0400 with message-id <E1xKqTV-0000000Brea-0H4c@zion> and subject line Re: Bug#648185: reportbug: ftp.debian.org RM bugs should get X-Debbugs-CC: maintainer has caused the Debian Bug report #648185, regarding reportbug: ftp.debian.org RM bugs should get X-Debbugs-CC: maintainer to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 648185: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648185 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: reportbug Version: 6.3 Severity: normal Hi, while filing a removal bug (#648063), I noticed (afterwards) that I would have liked it to explicitely CC the maintainers of said package. For this to happen, I think that when filing "RM" bugs for source packages, reportbug could automatically add those pseudo-headers: X-Debbugs-CC: ${src:package}@packages.qa.debian.org X-PTS-Approved: 1 Affects: src:${src:package} (The X-PTS-Approved header is needed for the X-Debbugs-CC to work, as per devref.) That way, RM bugs not filed by the maintainer are brought to the maintainer's ears by two channels: as a mail and as a bug appearing on the http://bugs.debian.org/src:${src:package} page. What do you think ? Cheers, OdyX -- Package-specific info: ** Environment settings: DEBEMAIL="[email protected]" INTERFACE="text" ** /home/didier/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version "5.0" mode advanced ui text sign gpg keyid 2BEF0A33 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (150, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii apt 0.8.15.9 ii python 2.7.2-9 ii python-reportbug 6.3 reportbug recommends no packages. Versions of packages reportbug suggests: ii debconf-utils <none> ii debsums 2.0.49 ii dlocate <none> ii emacs22-bin-common | emacs23-bin-common <none> ii exim4 4.77-1 ii exim4-daemon-light [mail-transport-agent] 4.77-1 ii file 5.09-2 ii gnupg 1.4.11-3 ii python-gtk2 2.24.0-2 ii python-gtkspell <none> ii python-urwid <none> ii python-vte <none> ii xdg-utils 1.1.0~rc1-2 Versions of packages python-reportbug depends on: ii apt 0.8.15.9 ii python 2.7.2-9 ii python-debian 0.1.21 ii python-debianbts 1.10 ii python-support 1.0.14 python-reportbug suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 11.6.0 Hi, since 11.6.0 (Paul Wise's "Notify packages of bugs against pseudo-packages that affect them"), reportbug adds X-Debbugs-Cc: <src>@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:<src> to ftp.debian.org removal and override requests, so the maintainer gets a copy. It uses @packages.debian.org rather than the @packages.qa address from the original request, which is now obsolete. Closing. Regards, Sandro
--- End Message ---
