Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2006 21:36:46 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line eterm bts cleanup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: eterm
Severity: normal
Many utilities would need the program
Esetroot
but it is not possible to make Depends: on it. Since the program does
not depend on eterm(1), but only provides a binary to chnage the
background, the eterm package shoudl be split to packages:
eterm
esetroot
This would make it much easier to add package dependencies:
Depends: esetroot
The user is not necessarily interested in eterm, in order to get
Esetroot(1) binary to his system. The current package dependency.
Depends: eterm
could be avoided. (see e.g. package gsetroot)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 353202 + wontfix
retitle 353202 [noop] eterm: Put 'Esetroot' into separate package.
thanks, control
Use hsetroot or something.
--- End Message ---
