Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:35:50 +0300
with message-id <87zmcvfvbt.GNU'[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388162: emacs-jabber: Constant messages "error in process
filter"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: emacs-jabber
Version: 0.7-3
Severity: minor
When I receive a message (nevermind in muc or not), I got always the
following in the echo area, every time:
error in process filter: Symbol's function definition is void: ja
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-486
Locale: LANG=bg_BG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages emacs-jabber depends on:
ii emacs-snapshot 1:20060915-1 The GNU Emacs editor (development
ii emacs-snapshot-gtk [emacs-s 1:20060915-1 The GNU Emacs editor (with GTK+ 2.
ii emacs21 21.4a-6 The GNU Emacs editor
Versions of packages emacs-jabber recommends:
ii flim 1:1.14.8+0.20060617-1 library about internet message for
ii xprintidle 0.1-1 Small utility that prints user's i
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Milan Zamazal wrote:
>
> Could you please check the values of the jabber-message-hooks and
> jabber-alert-message-hooks variables? It looks like one of them
> contains `ja' for some reason (maybe error in your configuration?).
I'm terribly sorry, I feel like an idiot. I don't know how this
happened, but the same error existed on the three machines that I have
upgraded from the unofficial package (maintained by Magnus Henoch,
IIRC) to your package when it entered the archive. Weird, but shame
on me that I didn't check that.
--- End Message ---
